[SCSI] zfcp: Replace fsf_req wait_queue with completion

The combination wait_queue/wakeup in conjunction with the flag
ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED to signal the completion of an fsfreq
was not race-safe and can be better solved by a completion.

Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
Swen Schillig 2009-08-18 15:43:14 +02:00 коммит произвёл James Bottomley
Родитель bd63eaf4b8
Коммит 058b864789
4 изменённых файлов: 10 добавлений и 28 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ enum zfcp_wka_status {
/* FSF request status (this does not have a common part) */ /* FSF request status (this does not have a common part) */
#define ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_TASK_MANAGEMENT 0x00000002 #define ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_TASK_MANAGEMENT 0x00000002
#define ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED 0x00000004
#define ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR 0x00000008 #define ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR 0x00000008
#define ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_CLEANUP 0x00000010 #define ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_CLEANUP 0x00000010
#define ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ABORTSUCCEEDED 0x00000040 #define ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ABORTSUCCEEDED 0x00000040
@ -532,7 +531,7 @@ struct zfcp_fsf_req {
u8 sbale_curr; /* current SBALE during creation u8 sbale_curr; /* current SBALE during creation
of request */ of request */
u8 sbal_response; /* SBAL used in interrupt */ u8 sbal_response; /* SBAL used in interrupt */
wait_queue_head_t completion_wq; /* can be used by a routine struct completion completion; /* can be used by a routine
to wait for completion */ to wait for completion */
u32 status; /* status of this request */ u32 status; /* status of this request */
u32 fsf_command; /* FSF Command copy */ u32 fsf_command; /* FSF Command copy */

Просмотреть файл

@ -485,8 +485,7 @@ static void zfcp_erp_strategy_check_fsfreq(struct zfcp_erp_action *act)
} }
if (act->status & ZFCP_STATUS_ERP_TIMEDOUT) if (act->status & ZFCP_STATUS_ERP_TIMEDOUT)
zfcp_rec_dbf_event_action("erscf_2", act); zfcp_rec_dbf_event_action("erscf_2", act);
if (act->fsf_req->status & (ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED | if (act->fsf_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_DISMISSED)
ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_DISMISSED))
act->fsf_req = NULL; act->fsf_req = NULL;
} else } else
act->fsf_req = NULL; act->fsf_req = NULL;

Просмотреть файл

@ -444,23 +444,11 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_req_complete(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
if (req->erp_action) if (req->erp_action)
zfcp_erp_notify(req->erp_action, 0); zfcp_erp_notify(req->erp_action, 0);
req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED;
if (likely(req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_CLEANUP)) if (likely(req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_CLEANUP))
zfcp_fsf_req_free(req); zfcp_fsf_req_free(req);
else else
/* notify initiator waiting for the requests completion */ complete(&req->completion);
/*
* FIXME: Race! We must not access fsf_req here as it might have been
* cleaned up already due to the set ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED
* flag. It's an improbable case. But, we have the same paranoia for
* the cleanup flag already.
* Might better be handled using complete()?
* (setting the flag and doing wakeup ought to be atomic
* with regard to checking the flag as long as waitqueue is
* part of the to be released structure)
*/
wake_up(&req->completion_wq);
} }
/** /**
@ -733,7 +721,7 @@ static struct zfcp_fsf_req *zfcp_fsf_req_create(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->list);
init_timer(&req->timer); init_timer(&req->timer);
init_waitqueue_head(&req->completion_wq); init_completion(&req->completion);
req->adapter = adapter; req->adapter = adapter;
req->fsf_command = fsf_cmd; req->fsf_command = fsf_cmd;
@ -1309,8 +1297,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_sync(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter,
retval = zfcp_fsf_req_send(req); retval = zfcp_fsf_req_send(req);
spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock); spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock);
if (!retval) if (!retval)
wait_event(req->completion_wq, wait_for_completion(&req->completion);
req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED);
zfcp_fsf_req_free(req); zfcp_fsf_req_free(req);
return retval; return retval;
@ -1405,8 +1392,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_sync(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter,
spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock); spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock);
if (!retval) if (!retval)
wait_event(req->completion_wq, wait_for_completion(&req->completion);
req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED);
zfcp_fsf_req_free(req); zfcp_fsf_req_free(req);
return retval; return retval;
@ -2572,8 +2559,7 @@ out:
spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock); spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock);
if (!retval) { if (!retval) {
wait_event(req->completion_wq, wait_for_completion(&req->completion);
req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED);
return req; return req;
} }
return ERR_PTR(retval); return ERR_PTR(retval);

Просмотреть файл

@ -206,8 +206,7 @@ static int zfcp_scsi_eh_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *scpnt)
if (!abrt_req) if (!abrt_req)
return FAILED; return FAILED;
wait_event(abrt_req->completion_wq, wait_for_completion(&abrt_req->completion);
abrt_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED);
if (abrt_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ABORTSUCCEEDED) if (abrt_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ABORTSUCCEEDED)
dbf_tag = "okay"; dbf_tag = "okay";
@ -246,8 +245,7 @@ static int zfcp_task_mgmt_function(struct scsi_cmnd *scpnt, u8 tm_flags)
if (!fsf_req) if (!fsf_req)
return FAILED; return FAILED;
wait_event(fsf_req->completion_wq, wait_for_completion(&fsf_req->completion);
fsf_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED);
if (fsf_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_TMFUNCFAILED) { if (fsf_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_TMFUNCFAILED) {
zfcp_scsi_dbf_event_devreset("fail", tm_flags, unit, scpnt); zfcp_scsi_dbf_event_devreset("fail", tm_flags, unit, scpnt);