[PATCH] x86-64: bitops fix for -Os
This fixes the x86-64 find_[first|next]_zero_bit() function for the end-of-range case. It didn't test for a zero size, and the "rep scas" would do entirely the wrong thing. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
cfa024f4e4
Коммит
06024f217d
|
@ -5,19 +5,23 @@
|
|||
#undef find_first_bit
|
||||
#undef find_next_bit
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* find_first_zero_bit - find the first zero bit in a memory region
|
||||
* @addr: The address to start the search at
|
||||
* @size: The maximum size to search
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns the bit-number of the first zero bit, not the number of the byte
|
||||
* containing a bit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
inline long find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
||||
static inline long
|
||||
__find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
long d0, d1, d2;
|
||||
long res;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must test the size in words, not in bits, because
|
||||
* otherwise incoming sizes in the range -63..-1 will not run
|
||||
* any scasq instructions, and then the flags used by the je
|
||||
* instruction will have whatever random value was in place
|
||||
* before. Nobody should call us like that, but
|
||||
* find_next_zero_bit() does when offset and size are at the
|
||||
* same word and it fails to find a zero itself.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
size += 63;
|
||||
size >>= 6;
|
||||
if (!size)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
asm volatile(
|
||||
|
@ -30,11 +34,29 @@ inline long find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
|||
" shlq $3,%%rdi\n"
|
||||
" addq %%rdi,%%rdx"
|
||||
:"=d" (res), "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1), "=&a" (d2)
|
||||
:"0" (0ULL), "1" ((size + 63) >> 6), "2" (addr), "3" (-1ULL),
|
||||
[addr] "r" (addr) : "memory");
|
||||
:"0" (0ULL), "1" (size), "2" (addr), "3" (-1ULL),
|
||||
[addr] "S" (addr) : "memory");
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Any register would do for [addr] above, but GCC tends to
|
||||
* prefer rbx over rsi, even though rsi is readily available
|
||||
* and doesn't have to be saved.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* find_first_zero_bit - find the first zero bit in a memory region
|
||||
* @addr: The address to start the search at
|
||||
* @size: The maximum size to search
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns the bit-number of the first zero bit, not the number of the byte
|
||||
* containing a bit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
long find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return __find_first_zero_bit (addr, size);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* find_next_zero_bit - find the first zero bit in a memory region
|
||||
* @addr: The address to base the search on
|
||||
|
@ -43,7 +65,7 @@ inline long find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
long find_next_zero_bit (const unsigned long * addr, long size, long offset)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long * p = ((unsigned long *) addr) + (offset >> 6);
|
||||
const unsigned long * p = addr + (offset >> 6);
|
||||
unsigned long set = 0;
|
||||
unsigned long res, bit = offset&63;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -63,8 +85,8 @@ long find_next_zero_bit (const unsigned long * addr, long size, long offset)
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* No zero yet, search remaining full words for a zero
|
||||
*/
|
||||
res = find_first_zero_bit ((const unsigned long *)p,
|
||||
size - 64 * (p - (unsigned long *) addr));
|
||||
res = __find_first_zero_bit (p, size - 64 * (p - addr));
|
||||
|
||||
return (offset + set + res);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -74,6 +96,19 @@ __find_first_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
|||
long d0, d1;
|
||||
long res;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must test the size in words, not in bits, because
|
||||
* otherwise incoming sizes in the range -63..-1 will not run
|
||||
* any scasq instructions, and then the flags used by the jz
|
||||
* instruction will have whatever random value was in place
|
||||
* before. Nobody should call us like that, but
|
||||
* find_next_bit() does when offset and size are at the same
|
||||
* word and it fails to find a one itself.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
size += 63;
|
||||
size >>= 6;
|
||||
if (!size)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
asm volatile(
|
||||
" repe; scasq\n"
|
||||
" jz 1f\n"
|
||||
|
@ -83,8 +118,7 @@ __find_first_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
|||
" shlq $3,%%rdi\n"
|
||||
" addq %%rdi,%%rax"
|
||||
:"=a" (res), "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1)
|
||||
:"0" (0ULL),
|
||||
"1" ((size + 63) >> 6), "2" (addr),
|
||||
:"0" (0ULL), "1" (size), "2" (addr),
|
||||
[addr] "r" (addr) : "memory");
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче