percpu_counter: make APIs irq safe

In my usage, sometimes the percpu APIs are called with irq locked,
sometimes not. lockdep complains there is potential deadlock. Let's
always use percpucounter lock in irq safe way. There should be no
performance penality, as all those are slow code path.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
Shaohua Li 2013-10-24 09:06:45 +01:00 коммит произвёл Jens Axboe
Родитель 71fe07d040
Коммит 098faf5805
1 изменённых файлов: 9 добавлений и 6 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -60,14 +60,15 @@ static inline void debug_percpu_counter_deactivate(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
{
int cpu;
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock(&fbc->lock);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
*pcount = 0;
}
fbc->count = amount;
raw_spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_set);
@ -78,9 +79,10 @@ void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
preempt_disable();
count = __this_cpu_read(*fbc->counters) + amount;
if (count >= batch || count <= -batch) {
raw_spin_lock(&fbc->lock);
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
fbc->count += count;
raw_spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
__this_cpu_write(*fbc->counters, 0);
} else {
__this_cpu_write(*fbc->counters, count);
@ -97,14 +99,15 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
s64 ret;
int cpu;
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock(&fbc->lock);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
ret = fbc->count;
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
ret += *pcount;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_sum);