Btrfs: fix off-by-one error of the reserved size of btrfs_allocate()

alloc_end is not the real end of the current extent, it is the start of the
next adjoining extent. So we needn't +1 when calculating the size the space
that is about to be reserved.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

fs/btrfs/file.c

@@ -2072,7 +2072,7 @@ static long btrfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode,
 	 * Make sure we have enough space before we do the
 	 * allocation.
 	 */
-	ret = btrfs_check_data_free_space(inode, alloc_end - alloc_start + 1);
+	ret = btrfs_check_data_free_space(inode, alloc_end - alloc_start);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -2179,7 +2179,7 @@ static long btrfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode,
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 	/* Let go of our reservation. */
-	btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, alloc_end - alloc_start + 1);
+	btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, alloc_end - alloc_start);
 	return ret;
 }