bpf: Remove the preceding __ from __bpf_selem_unlink_storage
__bpf_selem_unlink_storage is taking the spin lock and there is no name collision also. Having the preceding '__' is confusing when reviewing the later patch. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308065936.1550103-5-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
62827d612a
Коммит
121f31f3e0
|
@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static bool bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_stor
|
|||
return free_local_storage;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __bpf_selem_unlink_storage(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
|
||||
bool use_trace_rcu)
|
||||
static void bpf_selem_unlink_storage(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
|
||||
bool use_trace_rcu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
|
||||
bool free_local_storage = false;
|
||||
|
@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool use_trace_rcu)
|
|||
* the local_storage.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
|
||||
__bpf_selem_unlink_storage(selem, use_trace_rcu);
|
||||
bpf_selem_unlink_storage(selem, use_trace_rcu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If cacheit_lockit is false, this lookup function is lockless */
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче