locking/lockdep: Clean up check_redundant() a bit
In preparation for adding an TRACE_IRQFLAGS dependent skip function to check_redundant(), move it below the TRACE_IRQFLAGS #ifdef. While there, provide a stub function to reduce #ifdef usage. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
bc2dd71b28
Коммит
175b1a60e8
|
@ -2130,46 +2130,6 @@ check_noncircular(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target,
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check that the dependency graph starting at <src> can lead to
|
||||
* <target> or not. If it can, <src> -> <target> dependency is already
|
||||
* in the graph.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Return BFS_RMATCH if it does, or BFS_RMATCH if it does not, return BFS_E* if
|
||||
* any error appears in the bfs search.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static noinline enum bfs_result
|
||||
check_redundant(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target)
|
||||
{
|
||||
enum bfs_result ret;
|
||||
struct lock_list *target_entry;
|
||||
struct lock_list src_entry;
|
||||
|
||||
bfs_init_root(&src_entry, src);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Special setup for check_redundant().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* To report redundant, we need to find a strong dependency path that
|
||||
* is equal to or stronger than <src> -> <target>. So if <src> is E,
|
||||
* we need to let __bfs() only search for a path starting at a -(E*)->,
|
||||
* we achieve this by setting the initial node's ->only_xr to true in
|
||||
* that case. And if <prev> is S, we set initial ->only_xr to false
|
||||
* because both -(S*)-> (equal) and -(E*)-> (stronger) are redundant.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
src_entry.only_xr = src->read == 0;
|
||||
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant_checks);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = check_path(target, &src_entry, hlock_equal, NULL, &target_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret == BFS_RMATCH)
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -2706,6 +2666,55 @@ static inline int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr,
|
|||
}
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check that the dependency graph starting at <src> can lead to
|
||||
* <target> or not. If it can, <src> -> <target> dependency is already
|
||||
* in the graph.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Return BFS_RMATCH if it does, or BFS_RMATCH if it does not, return BFS_E* if
|
||||
* any error appears in the bfs search.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static noinline enum bfs_result
|
||||
check_redundant(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target)
|
||||
{
|
||||
enum bfs_result ret;
|
||||
struct lock_list *target_entry;
|
||||
struct lock_list src_entry;
|
||||
|
||||
bfs_init_root(&src_entry, src);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Special setup for check_redundant().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* To report redundant, we need to find a strong dependency path that
|
||||
* is equal to or stronger than <src> -> <target>. So if <src> is E,
|
||||
* we need to let __bfs() only search for a path starting at a -(E*)->,
|
||||
* we achieve this by setting the initial node's ->only_xr to true in
|
||||
* that case. And if <prev> is S, we set initial ->only_xr to false
|
||||
* because both -(S*)-> (equal) and -(E*)-> (stronger) are redundant.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
src_entry.only_xr = src->read == 0;
|
||||
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant_checks);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = check_path(target, &src_entry, hlock_equal, NULL, &target_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret == BFS_RMATCH)
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
||||
static inline enum bfs_result
|
||||
check_redundant(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return BFS_RNOMATCH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static void inc_chains(int irq_context)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT)
|
||||
|
@ -2926,7 +2935,6 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Is the <prev> -> <next> link redundant?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -2935,7 +2943,6 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
else if (ret == BFS_RMATCH)
|
||||
return 2;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if (!*trace) {
|
||||
*trace = save_trace();
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче