rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.

The current implementation of rtc_time64_to_tm() contains unnecessary
loops, branches and look-up tables. The new one uses an arithmetic-based
algorithm appeared in [1] and is approximately 4.3 times faster (YMMV).

The drawback is that the new code isn't intuitive and contains many 'magic
numbers' (not unusual for this type of algorithm). However, [1] justifies
all those numbers and, given this function's history, the code is unlikely
to need much maintenance, if any at all.

Add a KUnit test case that checks every day in a 160,000 years interval
starting on 1970-01-01 against the expected result. Add a new config
RTC_LIB_KUNIT_TEST symbol to give the option to run this test suite.

[1] Neri, Schneider, "Euclidean Affine Functions and Applications to
Calendar Algorithms". https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06959

Signed-off-by: Cassio Neri <cassio.neri@gmail.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624201343.85441-1-cassio.neri@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Cassio Neri 2021-06-24 21:13:43 +01:00 коммит произвёл Alexandre Belloni
Родитель fffd603ae9
Коммит 1d1bb12a8b
4 изменённых файлов: 168 добавлений и 25 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -10,6 +10,16 @@ config RTC_MC146818_LIB
bool
select RTC_LIB
config RTC_LIB_KUNIT_TEST
tristate "KUnit test for RTC lib functions" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
depends on KUNIT
default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
select RTC_LIB
help
Enable this option to test RTC library functions.
If unsure, say N.
menuconfig RTC_CLASS
bool "Real Time Clock"
default n

Просмотреть файл

@ -178,3 +178,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_WM8350) += rtc-wm8350.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_X1205) += rtc-x1205.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_XGENE) += rtc-xgene.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ZYNQMP) += rtc-zynqmp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_LIB_KUNIT_TEST) += lib_test.o

Просмотреть файл

@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
* Author: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
*
* based on arch/arm/common/rtctime.c and other bits
*
* Author: Cassio Neri <cassio.neri@gmail.com> (rtc_time64_to_tm)
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
@ -22,8 +24,6 @@ static const unsigned short rtc_ydays[2][13] = {
{ 0, 31, 60, 91, 121, 152, 182, 213, 244, 274, 305, 335, 366 }
};
#define LEAPS_THRU_END_OF(y) ((y) / 4 - (y) / 100 + (y) / 400)
/*
* The number of days in the month.
*/
@ -42,42 +42,95 @@ int rtc_year_days(unsigned int day, unsigned int month, unsigned int year)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtc_year_days);
/*
* rtc_time64_to_tm - Converts time64_t to rtc_time.
* Convert seconds since 01-01-1970 00:00:00 to Gregorian date.
/**
* rtc_time64_to_tm - converts time64_t to rtc_time.
*
* @time: The number of seconds since 01-01-1970 00:00:00.
* (Must be positive.)
* @tm: Pointer to the struct rtc_time.
*/
void rtc_time64_to_tm(time64_t time, struct rtc_time *tm)
{
unsigned int month, year, secs;
unsigned int secs;
int days;
u64 u64tmp;
u32 u32tmp, udays, century, day_of_century, year_of_century, year,
day_of_year, month, day;
bool is_Jan_or_Feb, is_leap_year;
/* time must be positive */
days = div_s64_rem(time, 86400, &secs);
/* day of the week, 1970-01-01 was a Thursday */
tm->tm_wday = (days + 4) % 7;
year = 1970 + days / 365;
days -= (year - 1970) * 365
+ LEAPS_THRU_END_OF(year - 1)
- LEAPS_THRU_END_OF(1970 - 1);
while (days < 0) {
year -= 1;
days += 365 + is_leap_year(year);
}
tm->tm_year = year - 1900;
tm->tm_yday = days + 1;
/*
* The following algorithm is, basically, Proposition 6.3 of Neri
* and Schneider [1]. In a few words: it works on the computational
* (fictitious) calendar where the year starts in March, month = 2
* (*), and finishes in February, month = 13. This calendar is
* mathematically convenient because the day of the year does not
* depend on whether the year is leap or not. For instance:
*
* March 1st 0-th day of the year;
* ...
* April 1st 31-st day of the year;
* ...
* January 1st 306-th day of the year; (Important!)
* ...
* February 28th 364-th day of the year;
* February 29th 365-th day of the year (if it exists).
*
* After having worked out the date in the computational calendar
* (using just arithmetics) it's easy to convert it to the
* corresponding date in the Gregorian calendar.
*
* [1] "Euclidean Affine Functions and Applications to Calendar
* Algorithms". https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06959
*
* (*) The numbering of months follows rtc_time more closely and
* thus, is slightly different from [1].
*/
for (month = 0; month < 11; month++) {
int newdays;
udays = ((u32) days) + 719468;
newdays = days - rtc_month_days(month, year);
if (newdays < 0)
break;
days = newdays;
}
tm->tm_mon = month;
tm->tm_mday = days + 1;
u32tmp = 4 * udays + 3;
century = u32tmp / 146097;
day_of_century = u32tmp % 146097 / 4;
u32tmp = 4 * day_of_century + 3;
u64tmp = 2939745ULL * u32tmp;
year_of_century = upper_32_bits(u64tmp);
day_of_year = lower_32_bits(u64tmp) / 2939745 / 4;
year = 100 * century + year_of_century;
is_leap_year = year_of_century != 0 ?
year_of_century % 4 == 0 : century % 4 == 0;
u32tmp = 2141 * day_of_year + 132377;
month = u32tmp >> 16;
day = ((u16) u32tmp) / 2141;
/*
* Recall that January 01 is the 306-th day of the year in the
* computational (not Gregorian) calendar.
*/
is_Jan_or_Feb = day_of_year >= 306;
/* Converts to the Gregorian calendar. */
year = year + is_Jan_or_Feb;
month = is_Jan_or_Feb ? month - 12 : month;
day = day + 1;
day_of_year = is_Jan_or_Feb ?
day_of_year - 306 : day_of_year + 31 + 28 + is_leap_year;
/* Converts to rtc_time's format. */
tm->tm_year = (int) (year - 1900);
tm->tm_mon = (int) month;
tm->tm_mday = (int) day;
tm->tm_yday = (int) day_of_year + 1;
tm->tm_hour = secs / 3600;
secs -= tm->tm_hour * 3600;

79
drivers/rtc/lib_test.c Normal file
Просмотреть файл

@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include <linux/rtc.h>
/*
* Advance a date by one day.
*/
static void advance_date(int *year, int *month, int *mday, int *yday)
{
if (*mday != rtc_month_days(*month - 1, *year)) {
++*mday;
++*yday;
return;
}
*mday = 1;
if (*month != 12) {
++*month;
++*yday;
return;
}
*month = 1;
*yday = 1;
++*year;
}
/*
* Checks every day in a 160000 years interval starting on 1970-01-01
* against the expected result.
*/
static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
{
/*
* 160000 years = (160000 / 400) * 400 years
* = (160000 / 400) * 146097 days
* = (160000 / 400) * 146097 * 86400 seconds
*/
time64_t total_secs = ((time64_t) 160000) / 400 * 146097 * 86400;
int year = 1970;
int month = 1;
int mday = 1;
int yday = 1;
struct rtc_time result;
time64_t secs;
s64 days;
for (secs = 0; secs <= total_secs; secs += 86400) {
rtc_time64_to_tm(secs, &result);
days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
#define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \
year, month, mday, yday, days
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, month - 1, result.tm_mon, FAIL_MSG);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, mday, result.tm_mday, FAIL_MSG);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, yday, result.tm_yday, FAIL_MSG);
advance_date(&year, &month, &mday, &yday);
}
}
static struct kunit_case rtc_lib_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range),
{}
};
static struct kunit_suite rtc_lib_test_suite = {
.name = "rtc_lib_test_cases",
.test_cases = rtc_lib_test_cases,
};
kunit_test_suite(rtc_lib_test_suite);