workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning

Use pr_warn() instead of the remaining pr_warning() calls.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191128004752.35268-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
To: joe@perches.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

kernel/workqueue.c

@@ -4374,8 +4374,8 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
 		if (WARN_ON(pwq_busy(pwq))) {
-			pr_warning("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
-				   __func__, wq->name);
+			pr_warn("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
+				__func__, wq->name);
 			show_pwq(pwq);
 			spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
 			mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);