From 1f6fa392a9942e4a2bd3122913baeb33e987ccd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Herring Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:35 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: st: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_ functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310144736.1546972-1-robh@kernel.org --- drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c index e6bd3c7a950a..3f1b8963639f 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int st_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) clk_set_rate(ddata->clk, ddata->clk_rate); } - if (of_get_property(np, "mbox-names", NULL)) { + if (of_property_present(np, "mbox-names")) { ddata->mbox_client_vq0.dev = dev; ddata->mbox_client_vq0.tx_done = NULL; ddata->mbox_client_vq0.tx_block = false;