rwsem: do not block readers at head of queue if other readers are active
This change fixes a race condition where a reader might determine it needs to block, but by the time it acquires the wait_lock the rwsem has active readers and no queued waiters. In this situation the reader can run in parallel with the existing active readers; it does not need to block until the active readers complete. Thanks to Peter Hurley for noticing this possible race. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
fe6e674c61
Коммит
25c3932596
10
lib/rwsem.c
10
lib/rwsem.c
|
@ -163,8 +163,14 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|||
/* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
|
||||
count = rwsem_atomic_update(adjustment, sem);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es). */
|
||||
if (!(count & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK))
|
||||
/* If there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If there are no writers and we are first in the queue,
|
||||
* wake our own waiter to join the existing active readers !
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS ||
|
||||
(count > RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
|
||||
adjustment != -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS))
|
||||
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_ANY);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче