Use WARN() instead of a printk+WARN_ON() pair; this way the message
becomes part of the warning section for better reporting/collection.
This way, the entire if() {} section can collapse into the WARN() as well.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Arjan van de Ven 2008-07-25 19:45:41 -07:00 коммит произвёл Linus Torvalds
Родитель 99fcd77d15
Коммит 267e2a9c71
1 изменённых файлов: 1 добавлений и 4 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -806,12 +806,9 @@ continue_removing:
if (S_ISDIR(de->mode))
parent->nlink--;
de->nlink = 0;
if (de->subdir) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: removing non-empty directory "
WARN(de->subdir, KERN_WARNING "%s: removing non-empty directory "
"'%s/%s', leaking at least '%s'\n", __func__,
de->parent->name, de->name, de->subdir->name);
WARN_ON(1);
}
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&de->count))
free_proc_entry(de);
}