staging: lustre: Fix typo in lustre/lnet

Correct spelling typo in comments and debug messages.

Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/lib-types.h

@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ typedef struct lnet_portal {
 	unsigned int		ptl_index;	/* portal ID, reserved */
 	/* flags on this portal: lazy, unique... */
 	unsigned int		ptl_options;
-	/* list of messags which are stealing buffer */
+	/* list of messages which are stealing buffer */
 	struct list_head		ptl_msg_stealing;
 	/* messages blocking for MD */
 	struct list_head		ptl_msg_delayed;

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c

@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ ksocknal_close_conn_locked (ksock_conn_t *conn, int error)
 
 		conn->ksnc_route = NULL;
 
-#if 0	   /* irrelevent with only eager routes */
+#if 0	   /* irrelevant with only eager routes */
 		/* make route least favourite */
 		list_del (&route->ksnr_list);
 		list_add_tail (&route->ksnr_list, &peer->ksnp_routes);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ ksocknal_peer_failed (ksock_peer_t *peer)
 
 	/* There has been a connection failure or comms error; but I'll only
 	 * tell LNET I think the peer is dead if it's to another kernel and
-	 * there are no connections or connection attempts in existance. */
+	 * there are no connections or connection attempts in existence. */
 
 	read_lock(&ksocknal_data.ksnd_global_lock);
 
@@ -2358,7 +2358,7 @@ ksocknal_new_incarnation (void)
 	/* The incarnation number is the time this module loaded and it
 	 * identifies this particular instance of the socknal.  Hopefully
 	 * we won't be able to reboot more frequently than 1MHz for the
-	 * forseeable future :) */
+	 * foreseeable future :) */
 
 	do_gettimeofday(&tv);
 

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd_cb.c

@@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ ksocknal_process_receive (ksock_conn_t *conn)
 	LASSERT (atomic_read(&conn->ksnc_conn_refcount) > 0);
 
 	/* NB: sched lock NOT held */
-	/* SOCKNAL_RX_LNET_HEADER is here for backward compatability */
+	/* SOCKNAL_RX_LNET_HEADER is here for backward compatibility */
 	LASSERT (conn->ksnc_rx_state == SOCKNAL_RX_KSM_HEADER ||
 		 conn->ksnc_rx_state == SOCKNAL_RX_LNET_PAYLOAD ||
 		 conn->ksnc_rx_state == SOCKNAL_RX_LNET_HEADER ||
@@ -1985,7 +1985,7 @@ ksocknal_connect (ksock_route_t *route)
 		list_splice_init(&peer->ksnp_tx_queue, &zombies);
 	}
 
-#if 0	   /* irrelevent with only eager routes */
+#if 0	   /* irrelevant with only eager routes */
 	if (!route->ksnr_deleted) {
 		/* make this route least-favourite for re-selection */
 		list_del(&route->ksnr_list);

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd_proto.c

@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ ksocknal_queue_tx_zcack_v3(ksock_conn_t *conn,
 	if (tx->tx_msg.ksm_zc_cookies[0] > tx->tx_msg.ksm_zc_cookies[1]) {
 		__u64   tmp = 0;
 
-		/* two seperated cookies: (a+2, a) or (a+1, a) */
+		/* two separated cookies: (a+2, a) or (a+1, a) */
 		LASSERT (tx->tx_msg.ksm_zc_cookies[0] -
 			 tx->tx_msg.ksm_zc_cookies[1] <= 2);
 

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-msg.c

@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ lnet_msg_attach_md(lnet_msg_t *msg, lnet_libmd_t *md,
 	LASSERT(!msg->msg_routing);
 
 	msg->msg_md = md;
-	if (msg->msg_receiving) { /* commited for receiving */
+	if (msg->msg_receiving) { /* committed for receiving */
 		msg->msg_offset = offset;
 		msg->msg_wanted = mlen;
 	}
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ lnet_complete_msg_locked(lnet_msg_t *msg, int cpt)
 		 * NB: message is committed for sending, we should return
 		 * on success because LND will finalize this message later.
 		 *
-		 * Also, there is possibility that message is commited for
+		 * Also, there is possibility that message is committed for
 		 * sending and also failed before delivering to LND,
 		 * i.e: ENOMEM, in that case we can't fall through either
 		 * because CPT for sending can be different with CPT for
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ lnet_complete_msg_locked(lnet_msg_t *msg, int cpt)
 		 * NB: message is committed for sending, we should return
 		 * on success because LND will finalize this message later.
 		 *
-		 * Also, there is possibility that message is commited for
+		 * Also, there is possibility that message is committed for
 		 * sending and also failed before delivering to LND,
 		 * i.e: ENOMEM, in that case we can't fall through either:
 		 * - The rule is message must decommit for sending first if
@@ -474,14 +474,14 @@ lnet_finalize (lnet_ni_t *ni, lnet_msg_t *msg, int status)
  again:
 	rc = 0;
 	if (!msg->msg_tx_committed && !msg->msg_rx_committed) {
-		/* not commited to network yet */
+		/* not committed to network yet */
 		LASSERT(!msg->msg_onactivelist);
 		lnet_msg_free(msg);
 		return;
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * NB: routed message can be commited for both receiving and sending,
+	 * NB: routed message can be committed for both receiving and sending,
 	 * we should finalize in LIFO order and keep counters correct.
 	 * (finalize sending first then finalize receiving)
 	 */

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/brw_test.c

@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ brw_server_rpc_done (srpc_server_rpc_t *rpc)
 			blk->bk_sink ? "from" : "to",
 			libcfs_id2str(rpc->srpc_peer), rpc->srpc_status);
 	else
-		CDEBUG (D_NET, "Transfered %d pages bulk data %s %s\n",
+		CDEBUG (D_NET, "Transferred %d pages bulk data %s %s\n",
 			blk->bk_niov, blk->bk_sink ? "from" : "to",
 			libcfs_id2str(rpc->srpc_peer));
 

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conrpc.c

@@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ lstcon_rpc_cleanup_wait(void)
 
 	lst_wait_until((atomic_read(&console_session.ses_rpc_counter) == 0),
 		       console_session.ses_rpc_lock,
-		       "Network is not accessable or target is down, "
+		       "Network is not accessible or target is down, "
 		       "waiting for %d console RPCs to being recycled\n",
 		       atomic_read(&console_session.ses_rpc_counter));
 

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/rpc.c

@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ srpc_del_client_rpc_timer (srpc_client_rpc_t *rpc)
 	if (rpc->crpc_timeout == 0)
 		return;
 
-	/* timer sucessfully defused */
+	/* timer successfully defused */
 	if (stt_del_timer(&rpc->crpc_timer))
 		return;