rtc: ab-b5ze-s3: remove unnecessary check

The core already checks that the alarm is set in the future. IT is not
necessary to do it again in the driver.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alexandre Belloni 2019-03-12 23:39:03 +01:00
Родитель 8188064985
Коммит 33fee143ac
1 изменённых файлов: 8 добавлений и 10 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -438,28 +438,25 @@ static int _abb5zes3_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
{
struct abb5zes3_rtc_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct rtc_time *alarm_tm = &alarm->time;
unsigned long rtc_secs, alarm_secs;
u8 regs[ABB5ZES3_ALRM_SEC_LEN];
struct rtc_time rtc_tm;
int ret, enable = 1;
ret = _abb5zes3_rtc_read_time(dev, &rtc_tm);
if (ret)
return ret;
rtc_secs = rtc_tm_to_time64(&rtc_tm);
alarm_secs = rtc_tm_to_time64(alarm_tm);
/* If alarm time is before current time, disable the alarm */
if (!alarm->enabled || alarm_secs <= rtc_secs) {
if (!alarm->enabled) {
enable = 0;
} else {
unsigned long rtc_secs, alarm_secs;
/*
* Chip only support alarms up to one month in the future. Let's
* return an error if we get something after that limit.
* Comparison is done by incrementing rtc_tm month field by one
* and checking alarm value is still below.
*/
ret = _abb5zes3_rtc_read_time(dev, &rtc_tm);
if (ret)
return ret;
if (rtc_tm.tm_mon == 11) { /* handle year wrapping */
rtc_tm.tm_mon = 0;
rtc_tm.tm_year += 1;
@ -468,6 +465,7 @@ static int _abb5zes3_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
}
rtc_secs = rtc_tm_to_time64(&rtc_tm);
alarm_secs = rtc_tm_to_time64(alarm_tm);
if (alarm_secs > rtc_secs) {
dev_err(dev, "%s: alarm maximum is one month in the "