usb: gadget: udc: atmel: don't disable enpdoints we don't own

UDC driver should NEVER do anything behind
udc-core's back, so let's stop disabling endpoints
we don't exactly own - rather we provide as
resources for gadget drivers. This fixes the
regression reported by Gil.

Reported-by: Gil Weber <gil.weber@servelec-technologies.com>
Tested-by: Gil Weber <gil.weber@servelec-technologies.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Felipe Balbi 2016-03-21 09:04:23 +02:00
Родитель e901aa159d
Коммит 38e58986e6
1 изменённых файлов: 0 добавлений и 14 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -1045,20 +1045,6 @@ static void reset_all_endpoints(struct usba_udc *udc)
list_del_init(&req->queue); list_del_init(&req->queue);
request_complete(ep, req, -ECONNRESET); request_complete(ep, req, -ECONNRESET);
} }
/* NOTE: normally, the next call to the gadget driver is in
* charge of disabling endpoints... usually disconnect().
* The exception would be entering a high speed test mode.
*
* FIXME remove this code ... and retest thoroughly.
*/
list_for_each_entry(ep, &udc->gadget.ep_list, ep.ep_list) {
if (ep->ep.desc) {
spin_unlock(&udc->lock);
usba_ep_disable(&ep->ep);
spin_lock(&udc->lock);
}
}
} }
static struct usba_ep *get_ep_by_addr(struct usba_udc *udc, u16 wIndex) static struct usba_ep *get_ep_by_addr(struct usba_udc *udc, u16 wIndex)