mfd: Don't use mutex_lock_interruptible in ab8500-core

This disadvantage of having it interruptible is that it would
appear to work OK in most situations, but in the rare case
that this call does fail, it can lead to misconfiguration
of the AB, such as a regulator not being turned off and
leading to a platform power consumption increase.

There's no real benefit to having this interruptible.

Make it a plain mutex_lock. The non-interruptability matches
other low-level I/O functions such as SPI and I2C.

Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Rabin Vincent 2012-03-08 14:01:46 +01:00 коммит произвёл Samuel Ortiz
Родитель bd155d2c3c
Коммит 392cbd1e60
1 изменённых файлов: 3 добавлений и 9 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -147,9 +147,7 @@ static int set_register_interruptible(struct ab8500 *ab8500, u8 bank,
dev_vdbg(ab8500->dev, "wr: addr %#x <= %#x\n", addr, data);
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ab8500->lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
mutex_lock(&ab8500->lock);
ret = ab8500->write(ab8500, addr, data);
if (ret < 0)
@ -176,9 +174,7 @@ static int get_register_interruptible(struct ab8500 *ab8500, u8 bank,
* bank on higher 8 bits and reg in lower */
u16 addr = ((u16)bank) << 8 | reg;
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ab8500->lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
mutex_lock(&ab8500->lock);
ret = ab8500->read(ab8500, addr);
if (ret < 0)
@ -210,9 +206,7 @@ static int mask_and_set_register_interruptible(struct ab8500 *ab8500, u8 bank,
* bank on higher 8 bits and reg in lower */
u16 addr = ((u16)bank) << 8 | reg;
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ab8500->lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
mutex_lock(&ab8500->lock);
ret = ab8500->read(ab8500, addr);
if (ret < 0) {