From 292fed1fc89509bab2c0b291d5d395dea5b6ab2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wei Yongjun Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:49:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] selinux: fix error return code in cond_read_list() Fix to return negative error code -ENOMEM from the error handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. Fixes: 60abd3181db2 ("selinux: convert cond_list to array") Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek Signed-off-by: Paul Moore --- security/selinux/ss/conditional.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c index 939a74fd8fb4..da94a1b4bfda 100644 --- a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c +++ b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ int cond_read_list(struct policydb *p, void *fp) p->cond_list = kcalloc(len, sizeof(*p->cond_list), GFP_KERNEL); if (!p->cond_list) - return rc; + return -ENOMEM; rc = avtab_alloc(&(p->te_cond_avtab), p->te_avtab.nel); if (rc) From fb73974172ffaaf57a7c42f35424d9aece1a5af6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:59:02 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] selinux: properly handle multiple messages in selinux_netlink_send() Fix the SELinux netlink_send hook to properly handle multiple netlink messages in a single sk_buff; each message is parsed and subject to SELinux access control. Prior to this patch, SELinux only inspected the first message in the sk_buff. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index b8e09aedbc56..487d4df0e37c 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -5842,40 +5842,60 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ipv6_postroute(void *priv, static int selinux_netlink_send(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) { - int err = 0; - u32 perm; + int rc = 0; + unsigned int msg_len; + unsigned int data_len = skb->len; + unsigned char *data = skb->data; struct nlmsghdr *nlh; struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security; + u16 sclass = sksec->sclass; + u32 perm; - if (skb->len < NLMSG_HDRLEN) { - err = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } - nlh = nlmsg_hdr(skb); + while (data_len >= nlmsg_total_size(0)) { + nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)data; - err = selinux_nlmsg_lookup(sksec->sclass, nlh->nlmsg_type, &perm); - if (err) { - if (err == -EINVAL) { + /* NOTE: the nlmsg_len field isn't reliably set by some netlink + * users which means we can't reject skb's with bogus + * length fields; our solution is to follow what + * netlink_rcv_skb() does and simply skip processing at + * messages with length fields that are clearly junk + */ + if (nlh->nlmsg_len < NLMSG_HDRLEN || nlh->nlmsg_len > data_len) + return 0; + + rc = selinux_nlmsg_lookup(sclass, nlh->nlmsg_type, &perm); + if (rc == 0) { + rc = sock_has_perm(sk, perm); + if (rc) + return rc; + } else if (rc == -EINVAL) { + /* -EINVAL is a missing msg/perm mapping */ pr_warn_ratelimited("SELinux: unrecognized netlink" - " message: protocol=%hu nlmsg_type=%hu sclass=%s" - " pid=%d comm=%s\n", - sk->sk_protocol, nlh->nlmsg_type, - secclass_map[sksec->sclass - 1].name, - task_pid_nr(current), current->comm); - if (!enforcing_enabled(&selinux_state) || - security_get_allow_unknown(&selinux_state)) - err = 0; + " message: protocol=%hu nlmsg_type=%hu sclass=%s" + " pid=%d comm=%s\n", + sk->sk_protocol, nlh->nlmsg_type, + secclass_map[sclass - 1].name, + task_pid_nr(current), current->comm); + if (enforcing_enabled(&selinux_state) && + !security_get_allow_unknown(&selinux_state)) + return rc; + rc = 0; + } else if (rc == -ENOENT) { + /* -ENOENT is a missing socket/class mapping, ignore */ + rc = 0; + } else { + return rc; } - /* Ignore */ - if (err == -ENOENT) - err = 0; - goto out; + /* move to the next message after applying netlink padding */ + msg_len = NLMSG_ALIGN(nlh->nlmsg_len); + if (msg_len >= data_len) + return 0; + data_len -= msg_len; + data += msg_len; } - err = sock_has_perm(sk, perm); -out: - return err; + return rc; } static void ipc_init_security(struct ipc_security_struct *isec, u16 sclass)