drm/amdkfd: process_info lock not needed for svm

process_info->lock is used to protect kfd_bo_list, vm_list_head, n_vms
and userptr valid/inval list, svm_range_restore_work and
svm_range_set_attr don't access those, so do not need to take
process_info lock. This will avoid potential circular locking issue.

Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
Philip Yang 2021-11-29 12:33:05 -05:00 коммит произвёл Alex Deucher
Родитель 428890a3fe
Коммит 3abfe30d80
1 изменённых файлов: 0 добавлений и 9 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -1574,7 +1574,6 @@ retry_flush_work:
static void svm_range_restore_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info;
struct svm_range_list *svms;
struct svm_range *prange;
struct kfd_process *p;
@ -1594,12 +1593,10 @@ static void svm_range_restore_work(struct work_struct *work)
* the lifetime of this thread, kfd_process and mm will be valid.
*/
p = container_of(svms, struct kfd_process, svms);
process_info = p->kgd_process_info;
mm = p->mm;
if (!mm)
return;
mutex_lock(&process_info->lock);
svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work(svms, mm);
mutex_lock(&svms->lock);
@ -1652,7 +1649,6 @@ static void svm_range_restore_work(struct work_struct *work)
out_reschedule:
mutex_unlock(&svms->lock);
mmap_write_unlock(mm);
mutex_unlock(&process_info->lock);
/* If validation failed, reschedule another attempt */
if (evicted_ranges) {
@ -3181,7 +3177,6 @@ static int
svm_range_set_attr(struct kfd_process *p, uint64_t start, uint64_t size,
uint32_t nattr, struct kfd_ioctl_svm_attribute *attrs)
{
struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info = p->kgd_process_info;
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
struct list_head update_list;
struct list_head insert_list;
@ -3200,8 +3195,6 @@ svm_range_set_attr(struct kfd_process *p, uint64_t start, uint64_t size,
svms = &p->svms;
mutex_lock(&process_info->lock);
svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work(svms, mm);
r = svm_range_is_valid(p, start, size);
@ -3277,8 +3270,6 @@ out_unlock_range:
mutex_unlock(&svms->lock);
mmap_read_unlock(mm);
out:
mutex_unlock(&process_info->lock);
pr_debug("pasid 0x%x svms 0x%p [0x%llx 0x%llx] done, r=%d\n", p->pasid,
&p->svms, start, start + size - 1, r);