From 3dd91570564679e13c4755cc5cdf2a535e3e1e34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ido Schimmel Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:59:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] selftests: mlxsw: Add TC flower test for Spectrum-2 Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- .../drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh | 366 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 366 insertions(+) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..3b75180f455d --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh @@ -0,0 +1,366 @@ +#!/bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +# This test is for checking the A-TCAM and C-TCAM operation in Spectrum-2. +# It tries to exercise as many code paths in the eRP state machine as +# possible. + +lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../../net/forwarding + +ALL_TESTS="single_mask_test identical_filters_test two_masks_test \ + multiple_masks_test ctcam_edge_cases_test" +NUM_NETIFS=2 +source $lib_dir/tc_common.sh +source $lib_dir/lib.sh + +tcflags="skip_hw" + +h1_create() +{ + simple_if_init $h1 192.0.2.1/24 198.51.100.1/24 +} + +h1_destroy() +{ + simple_if_fini $h1 192.0.2.1/24 198.51.100.1/24 +} + +h2_create() +{ + simple_if_init $h2 192.0.2.2/24 198.51.100.2/24 + tc qdisc add dev $h2 clsact +} + +h2_destroy() +{ + tc qdisc del dev $h2 clsact + simple_if_fini $h2 192.0.2.2/24 198.51.100.2/24 +} + +single_mask_test() +{ + # When only a single mask is required, the device uses the master + # mask and not the eRP table. Verify that under this mode the right + # filter is matched + + RET=0 + + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1 + check_err $? "Single filter - did not match" + + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 198.51.100.2 action drop + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 2 + check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority" + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.100.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1 + check_err $? "Two filters - did not match lowest priority" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.100.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 2 + check_err $? "Single filter - did not match after delete" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower + + log_test "single mask test ($tcflags)" +} + +identical_filters_test() +{ + # When two filters that only differ in their priority are used, + # one needs to be inserted into the C-TCAM. This test verifies + # that filters are correctly spilled to C-TCAM and that the right + # filter is matched + + RET=0 + + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1 + check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1 + check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter after A-TCAM delete" + + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 2 + check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter after A-TCAM add" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1 + check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter after C-TCAM delete" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower + + log_test "identical filters test ($tcflags)" +} + +two_masks_test() +{ + # When more than one mask is required, the eRP table is used. This + # test verifies that the eRP table is correctly allocated and used + + RET=0 + + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.0.0/16 action drop + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1 + check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1 + check_err $? "Single filter - did not match" + + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.0/24 action drop + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1 + check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority after add" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower + + log_test "two masks test ($tcflags)" +} + +multiple_masks_test() +{ + # The number of masks in a region is limited. Once the maximum + # number of masks has been reached filters that require new + # masks are spilled to the C-TCAM. This test verifies that + # spillage is performed correctly and that the right filter is + # matched + + local index + + RET=0 + + NUM_MASKS=32 + BASE_INDEX=100 + + for i in $(eval echo {1..$NUM_MASKS}); do + index=$((BASE_INDEX - i)) + + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref $index \ + handle $index \ + flower $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2/${i} src_ip 192.0.2.1 \ + action drop + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 \ + -B 192.0.2.2 -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" $index 1 + check_err $? "$i filters - did not match highest priority (add)" + done + + for i in $(eval echo {$NUM_MASKS..1}); do + index=$((BASE_INDEX - i)) + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 \ + -B 192.0.2.2 -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" $index 2 + check_err $? "$i filters - did not match highest priority (del)" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref $index \ + handle $index flower + done + + log_test "multiple masks test ($tcflags)" +} + +ctcam_two_atcam_masks_test() +{ + RET=0 + + # First case: C-TCAM is disabled when there are two A-TCAM masks. + # We push a filter into the C-TCAM by using two identical filters + # as in identical_filters_test() + + # Filter goes into A-TCAM + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + # Filter goes into C-TCAM + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + # Filter goes into A-TCAM + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.0/24 action drop + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1 + check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter" + + # Delete both A-TCAM and C-TCAM filters and make sure the remaining + # A-TCAM filter still works + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1 + check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower + + log_test "ctcam with two atcam masks test ($tcflags)" +} + +ctcam_one_atcam_mask_test() +{ + RET=0 + + # Second case: C-TCAM is disabled when there is one A-TCAM mask. + # The test is similar to identical_filters_test() + + # Filter goes into A-TCAM + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + # Filter goes into C-TCAM + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1 + check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + + $MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \ + -t ip -q + + tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1 + check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter" + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower + + log_test "ctcam with one atcam mask test ($tcflags)" +} + +ctcam_no_atcam_masks_test() +{ + RET=0 + + # Third case: C-TCAM is disabled when there are no A-TCAM masks + # This test exercises the code path that transitions the eRP table + # to its initial state after deleting the last C-TCAM mask + + # Filter goes into A-TCAM + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + # Filter goes into C-TCAM + tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \ + $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop + + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower + + log_test "ctcam with no atcam masks test ($tcflags)" +} + +ctcam_edge_cases_test() +{ + # When the C-TCAM is disabled after deleting the last C-TCAM + # mask, we want to make sure the eRP state machine is put in + # the correct state + + ctcam_two_atcam_masks_test + ctcam_one_atcam_mask_test + ctcam_no_atcam_masks_test +} + +setup_prepare() +{ + h1=${NETIFS[p1]} + h2=${NETIFS[p2]} + h1mac=$(mac_get $h1) + h2mac=$(mac_get $h2) + + vrf_prepare + + h1_create + h2_create +} + +cleanup() +{ + pre_cleanup + + h2_destroy + h1_destroy + + vrf_cleanup +} + +trap cleanup EXIT + +setup_prepare +setup_wait + +tests_run + +if ! tc_offload_check; then + check_err 1 "Could not test offloaded functionality" + log_test "mlxsw-specific tests for tc flower" + exit +else + tcflags="skip_sw" + tests_run +fi + +exit $EXIT_STATUS