From 420ba3cd035a202757f0848b435d743590deee94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Aring Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:43:16 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fs: dlm: handle -EBUSY first in unlock validation This patch checks for -EBUSY conditions in dlm_unlock() before checking for -EINVAL conditions (except for CANCEL and FORCEUNLOCK calls where a busy condition is expected.) There are no problems with the current ordering of checks, but this makes dlm_unlock() consistent with dlm_lock(), and may avoid future problems if other checks are added. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring Signed-off-by: David Teigland --- fs/dlm/lock.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c index c23413da40f5..16d339d383cd 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lock.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c @@ -2918,23 +2918,12 @@ static int validate_lock_args(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, static int validate_unlock_args(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_args *args) { struct dlm_ls *ls = lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls; - int rv = -EINVAL; + int rv = -EBUSY; - if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_MSTCPY) { - log_error(ls, "unlock on MSTCPY %x", lkb->lkb_id); - dlm_print_lkb(lkb); + /* normal unlock not allowed if there's any op in progress */ + if (!(args->flags & (DLM_LKF_CANCEL | DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK)) && + (lkb->lkb_wait_type || lkb->lkb_wait_count)) goto out; - } - - /* an lkb may still exist even though the lock is EOL'ed due to a - cancel, unlock or failed noqueue request; an app can't use these - locks; return same error as if the lkid had not been found at all */ - - if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_ENDOFLIFE) { - log_debug(ls, "unlock on ENDOFLIFE %x", lkb->lkb_id); - rv = -ENOENT; - goto out; - } /* an lkb may be waiting for an rsb lookup to complete where the lookup was initiated by another lock */ @@ -2949,7 +2938,24 @@ static int validate_unlock_args(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_args *args) unhold_lkb(lkb); /* undoes create_lkb() */ } /* caller changes -EBUSY to 0 for CANCEL and FORCEUNLOCK */ - rv = -EBUSY; + goto out; + } + + rv = -EINVAL; + if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_MSTCPY) { + log_error(ls, "unlock on MSTCPY %x", lkb->lkb_id); + dlm_print_lkb(lkb); + goto out; + } + + /* an lkb may still exist even though the lock is EOL'ed due to a + * cancel, unlock or failed noqueue request; an app can't use these + * locks; return same error as if the lkid had not been found at all + */ + + if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_ENDOFLIFE) { + log_debug(ls, "unlock on ENDOFLIFE %x", lkb->lkb_id); + rv = -ENOENT; goto out; } @@ -3022,14 +3028,8 @@ static int validate_unlock_args(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_args *args) goto out; } /* add_to_waiters() will set OVERLAP_UNLOCK */ - goto out_ok; } - /* normal unlock not allowed if there's any op in progress */ - rv = -EBUSY; - if (lkb->lkb_wait_type || lkb->lkb_wait_count) - goto out; - out_ok: /* an overlapping op shouldn't blow away exflags from other op */ lkb->lkb_exflags |= args->flags;