blk-mq: avoid to write intermediate result to hctx->next_cpu
This patch figures out the final selected CPU, then writes it to hctx->next_cpu once, then we can avoid to intermediate next cpu observed from other dispatch paths. Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
bffa9909a6
Коммит
476f8c98a9
|
@ -1344,26 +1344,24 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
|
||||||
static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
|
static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
bool tried = false;
|
bool tried = false;
|
||||||
|
int next_cpu = hctx->next_cpu;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1)
|
if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1)
|
||||||
return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
|
return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (--hctx->next_cpu_batch <= 0) {
|
if (--hctx->next_cpu_batch <= 0) {
|
||||||
int next_cpu;
|
|
||||||
select_cpu:
|
select_cpu:
|
||||||
next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(hctx->next_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
|
next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
|
||||||
cpu_online_mask);
|
cpu_online_mask);
|
||||||
if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
|
if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
|
||||||
next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask,cpu_online_mask);
|
next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* No online CPU is found, so have to make sure hctx->next_cpu
|
* No online CPU is found, so have to make sure hctx->next_cpu
|
||||||
* is set correctly for not breaking workqueue.
|
* is set correctly for not breaking workqueue.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
|
if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
|
||||||
hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
|
next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
|
||||||
else
|
|
||||||
hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
|
|
||||||
hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
|
hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1371,7 +1369,7 @@ select_cpu:
|
||||||
* Do unbound schedule if we can't find a online CPU for this hctx,
|
* Do unbound schedule if we can't find a online CPU for this hctx,
|
||||||
* and it should only happen in the path of handling CPU DEAD.
|
* and it should only happen in the path of handling CPU DEAD.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
if (!cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
|
if (!cpu_online(next_cpu)) {
|
||||||
if (!tried) {
|
if (!tried) {
|
||||||
tried = true;
|
tried = true;
|
||||||
goto select_cpu;
|
goto select_cpu;
|
||||||
|
@ -1381,10 +1379,13 @@ select_cpu:
|
||||||
* Make sure to re-select CPU next time once after CPUs
|
* Make sure to re-select CPU next time once after CPUs
|
||||||
* in hctx->cpumask become online again.
|
* in hctx->cpumask become online again.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
|
||||||
hctx->next_cpu_batch = 1;
|
hctx->next_cpu_batch = 1;
|
||||||
return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
|
return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return hctx->next_cpu;
|
|
||||||
|
hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
|
||||||
|
return next_cpu;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
|
static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
|
||||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче