btrfs: do not create raid sysfs entries under any locks
While running xfstests btrfs/177 I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff97066aa56760 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x7a/0xb0 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x60/0xb0 kobject_add_internal+0xc0/0x2c0 kobject_add+0x6e/0x90 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x102/0x160 btrfs_make_block_group+0x167/0x230 btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54f/0xb80 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x18e/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_new_inode+0x225/0x730 btrfs_create+0xab/0x1f0 lookup_open.isra.0+0x52d/0x690 path_openat+0x2a7/0x9e0 do_filp_open+0x75/0x100 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 do_unlinkat+0x1a9/0x2b0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff9fd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9706629780e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because when we link in a block group with a new raid index type we'll create the corresponding sysfs entries for it. This is problematic because while restriping we're holding the chunk_mutex, and while mounting we're holding the tree locks. Fixing this isn't pretty, we move the call to the sysfs stuff into the btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() work, where we're not holding any locks. This creates a slight race where other threads could see that there's no sysfs kobj for that raid type, and race to create the sysfs dir. Fix this by wrapping the creation in space_info->lock, so we only get one thread calling kobject_add() for the new directory. We don't worry about the lock on cleanup as it only gets deleted on unmount. On mount it's more straightforward, we loop through the space_infos already, just check every raid index in each space_info and added the sysfs entries for the corresponding block groups. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Josef Bacik
David Sterba
Родитель
7280490500
Коммит
49ea112da0
|
|
@ -1766,16 +1766,10 @@ static void link_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = cache->space_info;
|
||||
int index = btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(cache->flags);
|
||||
bool first = false;
|
||||
|
||||
down_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
|
||||
if (list_empty(&space_info->block_groups[index]))
|
||||
first = true;
|
||||
list_add_tail(&cache->list, &space_info->block_groups[index]);
|
||||
up_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
|
||||
|
||||
if (first)
|
||||
btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type(cache);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_create_block_group_cache(
|
||||
|
|
@ -2032,6 +2026,17 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(space_info, &info->space_info, list) {
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++) {
|
||||
if (list_empty(&space_info->block_groups[i]))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
cache = list_first_entry(&space_info->block_groups[i],
|
||||
struct btrfs_block_group,
|
||||
list);
|
||||
btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type(cache);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(btrfs_get_alloc_profile(info, space_info->flags) &
|
||||
(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 |
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1_MASK |
|
||||
|
|
@ -2091,12 +2096,16 @@ void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
while (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) {
|
||||
int index;
|
||||
|
||||
block_group = list_first_entry(&trans->new_bgs,
|
||||
struct btrfs_block_group,
|
||||
bg_list);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto next;
|
||||
|
||||
index = btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(block_group->flags);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = insert_block_group_item(trans, block_group);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
|
||||
|
|
@ -2105,6 +2114,16 @@ void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
|
|||
if (ret)
|
||||
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
|
||||
add_block_group_free_space(trans, block_group);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we restriped during balance, we may have added a new raid
|
||||
* type, so now add the sysfs entries when it is safe to do so.
|
||||
* We don't have to worry about locking here as it's handled in
|
||||
* btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (block_group->space_info->block_group_kobjs[index] == NULL)
|
||||
btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type(block_group);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Already aborted the transaction if it failed. */
|
||||
next:
|
||||
btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release(fs_info, 1);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1137,17 +1137,38 @@ void btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
|
|||
|
||||
rkobj->flags = cache->flags;
|
||||
kobject_init(&rkobj->kobj, &btrfs_raid_ktype);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We call this either on mount, or if we've created a block group for a
|
||||
* new index type while running (i.e. when restriping). The running
|
||||
* case is tricky because we could race with other threads, so we need
|
||||
* to have this check to make sure we didn't already init the kobject.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We don't have to protect on the free side because it only happens on
|
||||
* unmount.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
|
||||
if (space_info->block_group_kobjs[index]) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
|
||||
kobject_put(&rkobj->kobj);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
space_info->block_group_kobjs[index] = &rkobj->kobj;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = kobject_add(&rkobj->kobj, &space_info->kobj, "%s",
|
||||
btrfs_bg_type_to_raid_name(rkobj->flags));
|
||||
memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
|
||||
space_info->block_group_kobjs[index] = NULL;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
|
||||
kobject_put(&rkobj->kobj);
|
||||
btrfs_warn(fs_info,
|
||||
"failed to add kobject for block cache, ignoring");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
space_info->block_group_kobjs[index] = &rkobj->kobj;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче