KVM: x86: Fix INIT signal handling in various CPU states

Commit cd7764fe9f ("KVM: x86: latch INITs while in system management mode")
changed code to latch INIT while vCPU is in SMM and process latched INIT
when leaving SMM. It left a subtle remark in commit message that similar
treatment should also be done while vCPU is in VMX non-root-mode.

However, INIT signals should actually be latched in various vCPU states:
(*) For both Intel and AMD, INIT signals should be latched while vCPU
is in SMM.
(*) For Intel, INIT should also be latched while vCPU is in VMX
operation and later processed when vCPU leaves VMX operation by
executing VMXOFF.
(*) For AMD, INIT should also be latched while vCPU runs with GIF=0
or in guest-mode with intercept defined on INIT signal.

To fix this:
1) Add kvm_x86_ops->apic_init_signal_blocked() such that each CPU vendor
can define the various CPU states in which INIT signals should be
blocked and modify kvm_apic_accept_events() to use it.
2) Modify vmx_check_nested_events() to check for pending INIT signal
while vCPU in guest-mode. If so, emualte vmexit on
EXIT_REASON_INIT_SIGNAL. Note that nSVM should have similar behaviour
but is currently left as a TODO comment to implement in the future
because nSVM don't yet implement svm_check_nested_events().

Note: Currently KVM nVMX implementation don't support VMX wait-for-SIPI
activity state as specified in MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC bits 6:8 exposed to
guest (See nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs()).
If and when support for this activity state will be implemented,
kvm_check_nested_events() would need to avoid emulating vmexit on
INIT signal in case activity-state is wait-for-SIPI. In addition,
kvm_apic_accept_events() would need to be modified to avoid discarding
SIPI in case VMX activity-state is wait-for-SIPI but instead delay
SIPI processing to vmx_check_nested_events() that would clear
pending APIC events and emulate vmexit on SIPI.

Reviewed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Co-developed-by: Nikita Leshenko <nikita.leshchenko@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Leshenko <nikita.leshchenko@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h

@@ -1209,6 +1209,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
 	uint16_t (*nested_get_evmcs_version)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 	bool (*need_emulation_on_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+	bool (*apic_init_signal_blocked)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 };
 
 struct kvm_arch_async_pf {

arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c

@@ -2706,11 +2706,14 @@ void kvm_apic_accept_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return;
 
 	/*
-	 * INITs are latched while in SMM.  Because an SMM CPU cannot
-	 * be in KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED state, just eat SIPIs
-	 * and delay processing of INIT until the next RSM.
+	 * INITs are latched while CPU is in specific states
+	 * (SMM, VMX non-root mode, SVM with GIF=0).
+	 * Because a CPU cannot be in these states immediately
+	 * after it has processed an INIT signal (and thus in
+	 * KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED state), just eat SIPIs
+	 * and leave the INIT pending.
 	 */
-	if (is_smm(vcpu)) {
+	if (is_smm(vcpu) || kvm_x86_ops->apic_init_signal_blocked(vcpu)) {
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED);
 		if (test_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events))
 			clear_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events);

arch/x86/kvm/svm.c

@@ -7170,6 +7170,21 @@ static bool svm_need_emulation_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static bool svm_apic_init_signal_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+
+	/*
+	 * TODO: Last condition latch INIT signals on vCPU when
+	 * vCPU is in guest-mode and vmcb12 defines intercept on INIT.
+	 * To properly emulate the INIT intercept, SVM should implement
+	 * kvm_x86_ops->check_nested_events() and call nested_svm_vmexit()
+	 * there if an INIT signal is pending.
+	 */
+	return !gif_set(svm) ||
+		   (svm->vmcb->control.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_INIT));
+}
+
 static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.cpu_has_kvm_support = has_svm,
 	.disabled_by_bios = is_disabled,
@@ -7306,6 +7321,8 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.nested_get_evmcs_version = nested_get_evmcs_version,
 
 	.need_emulation_on_page_fault = svm_need_emulation_on_page_fault,
+
+	.apic_init_signal_blocked = svm_apic_init_signal_blocked,
 };
 
 static int __init svm_init(void)

arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c

@@ -3409,6 +3409,15 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool external_intr)
 	unsigned long exit_qual;
 	bool block_nested_events =
 	    vmx->nested.nested_run_pending || kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu);
+	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
+
+	if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu) &&
+		test_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &apic->pending_events)) {
+		if (block_nested_events)
+			return -EBUSY;
+		nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_INIT_SIGNAL, 0, 0);
+		return 0;
+	}
 
 	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending &&
 		nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, &exit_qual)) {
@@ -4470,7 +4479,12 @@ static int handle_vmoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu))
 		return 1;
+
 	free_nested(vcpu);
+
+	/* Process a latched INIT during time CPU was in VMX operation */
+	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
+
 	return nested_vmx_succeed(vcpu);
 }
 

arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c

@@ -7470,6 +7470,11 @@ static bool vmx_need_emulation_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static bool vmx_apic_init_signal_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmxon;
+}
+
 static __init int hardware_setup(void)
 {
 	unsigned long host_bndcfgs;
@@ -7794,6 +7799,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.get_vmcs12_pages = NULL,
 	.nested_enable_evmcs = NULL,
 	.need_emulation_on_page_fault = vmx_need_emulation_on_page_fault,
+	.apic_init_signal_blocked = vmx_apic_init_signal_blocked,
 };
 
 static void vmx_cleanup_l1d_flush(void)