drm/i915: stop using seqcount for fence pruning
After waiting for a reservation object use reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu to opportunistically prune the fences on the object. This allows removal of the seqcount handling in the reservation object. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/322032/?series=64786&rev=1
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
96e95496b0
Коммит
4c2488cfaa
|
@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_reservation(struct reservation_object *resv,
|
|||
unsigned int flags,
|
||||
long timeout)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int seq = __read_seqcount_begin(&resv->seq);
|
||||
struct dma_fence *excl;
|
||||
bool prune_fences = false;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -83,15 +82,12 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_reservation(struct reservation_object *resv,
|
|||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Opportunistically prune the fences iff we know they have *all* been
|
||||
* signaled and that the reservation object has not been changed (i.e.
|
||||
* no new fences have been added).
|
||||
* signaled.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (prune_fences && !__read_seqcount_retry(&resv->seq, seq)) {
|
||||
if (reservation_object_trylock(resv)) {
|
||||
if (!__read_seqcount_retry(&resv->seq, seq))
|
||||
reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
|
||||
reservation_object_unlock(resv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (prune_fences && reservation_object_trylock(resv)) {
|
||||
if (reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(resv, true))
|
||||
reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
|
||||
reservation_object_unlock(resv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return timeout;
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче