clk: Don't hold prepare_lock when calling kref_put()

[ Upstream commit 6f63af7511e7058f3fa4ad5b8102210741c9f947 ]

We don't need to hold the prepare_lock when dropping a ref on a struct
clk_core. The release function is only freeing memory and any code with
a pointer reference has already unlinked anything pointing to the
clk_core. This reduces the holding area of the prepare_lock a bit.

Note that we also don't call free_clk() with the prepare_lock held.
There isn't any reason to do that.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240325184204.745706-3-sboyd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Stephen Boyd 2024-03-25 11:41:56 -07:00 коммит произвёл Greg Kroah-Hartman
Родитель 7ca04b83c1
Коммит 4d36b9b7ec
1 изменённых файлов: 5 добавлений и 7 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -4227,7 +4227,8 @@ void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk)
if (ops == &clk_nodrv_ops) {
pr_err("%s: unregistered clock: %s\n", __func__,
clk->core->name);
goto unlock;
clk_prepare_unlock();
return;
}
/*
* Assign empty clock ops for consumers that might still hold
@ -4261,11 +4262,10 @@ void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk)
if (clk->core->protect_count)
pr_warn("%s: unregistering protected clock: %s\n",
__func__, clk->core->name);
clk_prepare_unlock();
kref_put(&clk->core->ref, __clk_release);
free_clk(clk);
unlock:
clk_prepare_unlock();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_unregister);
@ -4471,13 +4471,11 @@ void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
clk->max_rate < clk->core->req_rate)
clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate);
owner = clk->core->owner;
kref_put(&clk->core->ref, __clk_release);
clk_prepare_unlock();
owner = clk->core->owner;
kref_put(&clk->core->ref, __clk_release);
module_put(owner);
free_clk(clk);
}