ovl: fix spelling mistakes
fix follow spelling misktakes: decendant ==> descendant indentify ==> identify underlaying ==> underlying Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@santino.com> Signed-off-by: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
dd524b7f31
Коммит
4f1196288d
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int ovl_check_redirect(struct path *path, struct ovl_lookup_data *d,
|
|||
* One of the ancestor path elements in an absolute path
|
||||
* lookup in ovl_lookup_layer() could have been opaque and
|
||||
* that will stop further lookup in lower layers (d->stop=true)
|
||||
* But we have found an absolute redirect in decendant path
|
||||
* But we have found an absolute redirect in descendant path
|
||||
* element and that should force continue lookup in lower
|
||||
* layers (reset d->stop).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static int ovl_get_index_name_fh(struct ovl_fh *fh, struct qstr *name)
|
|||
* If the index dentry for a copy up origin inode is positive, but points
|
||||
* to an inode different than the upper inode, then either the upper inode
|
||||
* has been copied up and not indexed or it was indexed, but since then
|
||||
* index dir was cleared. Either way, that index cannot be used to indentify
|
||||
* index dir was cleared. Either way, that index cannot be used to identify
|
||||
* the overlay inode.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int ovl_get_index_name(struct ovl_fs *ofs, struct dentry *origin,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ static int ovl_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
|
|||
sb->s_stack_depth = 0;
|
||||
sb->s_maxbytes = MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;
|
||||
atomic_long_set(&ofs->last_ino, 1);
|
||||
/* Assume underlaying fs uses 32bit inodes unless proven otherwise */
|
||||
/* Assume underlying fs uses 32bit inodes unless proven otherwise */
|
||||
if (ofs->config.xino != OVL_XINO_OFF) {
|
||||
ofs->xino_mode = BITS_PER_LONG - 32;
|
||||
if (!ofs->xino_mode) {
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче