scsi: ufs: Do not free irq in suspend
Since ufshcd irq resource is allocated with the device resource management aware IRQ request implementation, we don't really need to free up irq during suspend, disabling it during suspend and reenabling it during resume should be good enough. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0101016ed3d69793-22918f99-23bf-495d-8a36-a9c108d1cbce-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
0834253734
Коммит
5231d38c16
|
@ -266,26 +266,18 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_valid_tag(struct ufs_hba *hba, int tag)
|
|||
return tag >= 0 && tag < hba->nutrs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int ufshcd_enable_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba)
|
||||
static inline void ufshcd_enable_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hba->is_irq_enabled) {
|
||||
ret = request_irq(hba->irq, ufshcd_intr, IRQF_SHARED, UFSHCD,
|
||||
hba);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: request_irq failed, ret=%d\n",
|
||||
__func__, ret);
|
||||
enable_irq(hba->irq);
|
||||
hba->is_irq_enabled = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void ufshcd_disable_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (hba->is_irq_enabled) {
|
||||
free_irq(hba->irq, hba);
|
||||
disable_irq(hba->irq);
|
||||
hba->is_irq_enabled = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -7959,9 +7951,7 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
|
|||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
/* enable the host irq as host controller would be active soon */
|
||||
ret = ufshcd_enable_irq(hba);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto disable_irq_and_vops_clks;
|
||||
ufshcd_enable_irq(hba);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = ufshcd_vreg_set_hpm(hba);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче