IMA: support for duplicate measurement records
IMA measures contents of a given file/buffer/critical-data record, and properly re-measures it on change. However, IMA does not measure the duplicate value for a given record, since TPM extend is a very expensive operation. For example, if the record changes from value 'v#1' to 'v#2', and then back to 'v#1', IMA will not measure and log the last change to 'v#1', since the hash of 'v#1' for that record is already present in the IMA htable. This limits the ability of an external attestation service to accurately determine the current state of the system. The service would incorrectly conclude that the latest value of the given record on the system is 'v#2', and act accordingly. Define and use a new Kconfig option IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE to permit duplicate records in the IMA measurement list. In addition to the duplicate measurement records described above, other duplicate file measurement records may be included in the log, when CONFIG_IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE is enabled. For example, - i_version is not enabled, - i_generation changed, - same file present on different filesystems, - an inode is evicted from dcache Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> [zohar@linux.ibm.com: updated list of duplicate measurement records] Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
c67913492f
Коммит
52c208397c
|
@ -334,3 +334,10 @@ config IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT
|
|||
help
|
||||
This option is selected by architectures to enable secure and/or
|
||||
trusted boot based on IMA runtime policies.
|
||||
|
||||
config IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE
|
||||
bool "Disable htable to allow measurement of duplicate records"
|
||||
depends on IMA
|
||||
default n
|
||||
help
|
||||
This option disables htable to allow measurement of duplicate records.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int ima_add_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry, int violation,
|
|||
int result = 0, tpmresult = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ima_extend_list_mutex);
|
||||
if (!violation) {
|
||||
if (!violation && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE)) {
|
||||
if (ima_lookup_digest_entry(digest, entry->pcr)) {
|
||||
audit_cause = "hash_exists";
|
||||
result = -EEXIST;
|
||||
|
@ -176,7 +176,8 @@ int ima_add_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry, int violation,
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result = ima_add_digest_entry(entry, 1);
|
||||
result = ima_add_digest_entry(entry,
|
||||
!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE));
|
||||
if (result < 0) {
|
||||
audit_cause = "ENOMEM";
|
||||
audit_info = 0;
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче