synchronization in usb_serial_put
I think there is a race between usb_serial_put() and usb_serial_get_by_index() (and get_free_serial()) with regards to handling the serial port refcount. usb_serial_get_by_index() gets a reference on the serial port under table_lock while return_serial releases all the returned ports from the table under the same lock. However, the table_lock is not taken around the call to kref_put, theoretically allowing to sneak in and grab a reference after kref_put has already determined that the reference count is zero (and before calling destroy_serial) causing use after free. Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@ns1.bhalevy.com> Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
efdff60885
Коммит
52f6b5e1f1
|
@ -122,11 +122,9 @@ static void return_serial(struct usb_serial *serial)
|
|||
if (serial == NULL)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&table_lock);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < serial->num_ports; ++i) {
|
||||
serial_table[serial->minor + i] = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&table_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void destroy_serial(struct kref *kref)
|
||||
|
@ -174,7 +172,9 @@ static void destroy_serial(struct kref *kref)
|
|||
|
||||
void usb_serial_put(struct usb_serial *serial)
|
||||
{
|
||||
spin_lock(&table_lock);
|
||||
kref_put(&serial->kref, destroy_serial);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&table_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*****************************************************************************
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче