audit: add space before parenthesis and around '=', "==", and '<'

Fixes following checkpatch.pl issue:
ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
ERROR: spaces required around that '='
ERROR: spaces required around that '<'
ERROR: spaces required around that '=='

Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com>
[PM: subject line tweaks]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
This commit is contained in:
Atul Kumar Pant 2023-08-16 02:15:53 +05:30 коммит произвёл Paul Moore
Родитель b59bc6e372
Коммит 62acadda11
3 изменённых файлов: 10 добавлений и 10 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static void fill_ac(acct_t *ac)
do_div(elapsed, AHZ);
btime = ktime_get_real_seconds() - elapsed;
ac->ac_btime = clamp_t(time64_t, btime, 0, U32_MAX);
#if ACCT_VERSION==2
#if ACCT_VERSION == 2
ac->ac_ahz = AHZ;
#endif

Просмотреть файл

@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int audit_match_signal(struct audit_entry *entry)
entry->rule.mask));
}
switch(audit_classify_arch(arch->val)) {
switch (audit_classify_arch(arch->val)) {
case 0: /* native */
return (audit_match_class_bits(AUDIT_CLASS_SIGNAL,
entry->rule.mask));
@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static inline struct audit_entry *audit_to_entry_common(struct audit_rule_data *
err = -EINVAL;
listnr = rule->flags & ~AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND;
switch(listnr) {
switch (listnr) {
default:
goto exit_err;
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int audit_field_valid(struct audit_entry *entry, struct audit_field *f)
switch (entry->rule.listnr) {
case AUDIT_FILTER_FS:
switch(f->type) {
switch (f->type) {
case AUDIT_FSTYPE:
case AUDIT_FILTERKEY:
break;
@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static struct audit_rule_data *audit_krule_to_data(struct audit_krule *krule)
data->fields[i] = f->type;
data->fieldflags[i] = audit_ops[f->op];
switch(f->type) {
switch (f->type) {
case AUDIT_SUBJ_USER:
case AUDIT_SUBJ_ROLE:
case AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE:
@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int audit_compare_rule(struct audit_krule *a, struct audit_krule *b)
a->fields[i].op != b->fields[i].op)
return 1;
switch(a->fields[i].type) {
switch (a->fields[i].type) {
case AUDIT_SUBJ_USER:
case AUDIT_SUBJ_ROLE:
case AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE:
@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)
int dont_count = 0;
/* If any of these, don't count towards total */
switch(entry->rule.listnr) {
switch (entry->rule.listnr) {
case AUDIT_FILTER_USER:
case AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE:
case AUDIT_FILTER_FS:
@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)
int dont_count = 0;
/* If any of these, don't count towards total */
switch(entry->rule.listnr) {
switch (entry->rule.listnr) {
case AUDIT_FILTER_USER:
case AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE:
case AUDIT_FILTER_FS:
@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static void audit_list_rules(int seq, struct sk_buff_head *q)
/* This is a blocking read, so use audit_filter_mutex instead of rcu
* iterator to sync with list writers. */
for (i=0; i<AUDIT_NR_FILTERS; i++) {
for (i = 0; i < AUDIT_NR_FILTERS; i++) {
list_for_each_entry(r, &audit_rules_list[i], list) {
struct audit_rule_data *data;

Просмотреть файл

@ -2124,7 +2124,7 @@ retry:
d = dentry;
rcu_read_lock();
seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
for(;;) {
for (;;) {
struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(d);
if (inode && unlikely(inode->i_fsnotify_marks)) {