regulator: Fetch enable gpiods nonexclusive
Since the core regulator code is treating GPIO descriptors as nonexclusive, i.e. it assumes that the enable GPIO line may be shared with several regulators, let's add the flag introduced for fixing this problem on fixed regulators to all drivers fetching GPIO descriptors to avoid possible regressions. Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
b0ce7b29bf
Коммит
63239e4bf7
|
@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static int arizona_ldo1_common_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
|
|||
* so clean up would happen at the wrong time
|
||||
*/
|
||||
config.ena_gpiod = gpiod_get_optional(parent_dev, "wlf,ldoena",
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_LOW | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(config.ena_gpiod))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(config.ena_gpiod);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static struct da9211_pdata *da9211_parse_regulators_dt(
|
|||
da9211_matches[i].of_node,
|
||||
"enable",
|
||||
0,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE,
|
||||
"da9211-enable");
|
||||
n++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -227,9 +227,11 @@ static struct gpio_desc *lm363x_regulator_of_get_enable_gpio(struct device *dev,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
switch (id) {
|
||||
case LM3632_LDO_POS:
|
||||
return devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "enable", 0, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
|
||||
return devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "enable", 0,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_LOW | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
case LM3632_LDO_NEG:
|
||||
return devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "enable", 1, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
|
||||
return devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "enable", 1,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_LOW | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -505,7 +505,8 @@ static int lp8788_config_ldo_enable_mode(struct platform_device *pdev,
|
|||
ldo->ena_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(&pdev->dev,
|
||||
"enable",
|
||||
enable_id,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH |
|
||||
GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(ldo->ena_gpiod))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(ldo->ena_gpiod);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static int max8952_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
|
|||
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH;
|
||||
else
|
||||
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
|
||||
gflags |= GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE;
|
||||
gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev,
|
||||
"max8952,en",
|
||||
gflags);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -758,6 +758,7 @@ static int max8973_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
|
|||
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH;
|
||||
else
|
||||
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
|
||||
gflags |= GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE;
|
||||
gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev,
|
||||
"maxim,enable",
|
||||
gflags);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -571,11 +571,12 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rdata->ext_control_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev,
|
||||
rdata->ext_control_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(
|
||||
&pdev->dev,
|
||||
reg_np,
|
||||
"s5m8767,pmic-ext-control-gpios",
|
||||
0,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE,
|
||||
"s5m8767");
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(rdata->ext_control_gpiod))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(rdata->ext_control_gpiod);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ static struct tps65090_platform_data *tps65090_parse_dt_reg_data(
|
|||
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH;
|
||||
else
|
||||
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
|
||||
gflags |= GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE;
|
||||
|
||||
rpdata->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev,
|
||||
tps65090_matches[idx].of_node,
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче