ACPI / PM: Drop stale comment from acpi_power_transition()
An old comment in acpi_power_transition() indicates that support for ordering power resources needs to be added, but the current code handles that already. Drop the comment to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
5ebe6afaf0
Коммит
6656bde5ec
|
@ -710,8 +710,6 @@ int acpi_power_transition(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
|
|||
|| (device->power.state > ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD))
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
|
||||
/* TBD: Resources must be ordered. */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* First we reference all power resources required in the target list
|
||||
* (e.g. so the device doesn't lose power while transitioning). Then,
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче