drbd: possibly disable discard support, if backend has discard_zeroes_data=0
Now that we have the discard_zeroes_if_aligned setting, we should also check it when setting up our queue parameters on the primary, not only on the receiving side. We announce discard support, UNLESS * we are connected to a peer that does not support TRIM on the DRBD protocol level. Otherwise, it would either discard, or do a fallback to zero-out, depending on its backend and configuration. * our local backend does not support discards, or (discard_zeroes_data=0 AND discard_zeroes_if_aligned=no). Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
dd4f699da6
Коммит
69ba1ee936
|
@ -1154,6 +1154,59 @@ static int drbd_check_al_size(struct drbd_device *device, struct disk_conf *dc)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void blk_queue_discard_granularity(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int granularity)
|
||||
{
|
||||
q->limits.discard_granularity = granularity;
|
||||
}
|
||||
static void decide_on_discard_support(struct drbd_device *device,
|
||||
struct request_queue *q,
|
||||
struct request_queue *b,
|
||||
bool discard_zeroes_if_aligned)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* q = drbd device queue (device->rq_queue)
|
||||
* b = backing device queue (device->ldev->backing_bdev->bd_disk->queue),
|
||||
* or NULL if diskless
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct drbd_connection *connection = first_peer_device(device)->connection;
|
||||
bool can_do = b ? blk_queue_discard(b) : true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (can_do && b && !b->limits.discard_zeroes_data && !discard_zeroes_if_aligned) {
|
||||
can_do = false;
|
||||
drbd_info(device, "discard_zeroes_data=0 and discard_zeroes_if_aligned=no: disabling discards\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (can_do && connection->cstate >= C_CONNECTED && !(connection->agreed_features & FF_TRIM)) {
|
||||
can_do = false;
|
||||
drbd_info(connection, "peer DRBD too old, does not support TRIM: disabling discards\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (can_do) {
|
||||
/* We don't care for the granularity, really.
|
||||
* Stacking limits below should fix it for the local
|
||||
* device. Whether or not it is a suitable granularity
|
||||
* on the remote device is not our problem, really. If
|
||||
* you care, you need to use devices with similar
|
||||
* topology on all peers. */
|
||||
blk_queue_discard_granularity(q, 512);
|
||||
q->limits.max_discard_sectors = DRBD_MAX_DISCARD_SECTORS;
|
||||
queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
|
||||
blk_queue_discard_granularity(q, 0);
|
||||
q->limits.max_discard_sectors = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void fixup_discard_if_not_supported(struct request_queue *q)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* To avoid confusion, if this queue does not support discard, clear
|
||||
* max_discard_sectors, which is what lsblk -D reports to the user.
|
||||
* Older kernels got this wrong in "stack limits".
|
||||
* */
|
||||
if (!blk_queue_discard(q)) {
|
||||
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
|
||||
blk_queue_discard_granularity(q, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void drbd_setup_queue_param(struct drbd_device *device, struct drbd_backing_dev *bdev,
|
||||
unsigned int max_bio_size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1183,26 +1236,8 @@ static void drbd_setup_queue_param(struct drbd_device *device, struct drbd_backi
|
|||
/* This is the workaround for "bio would need to, but cannot, be split" */
|
||||
blk_queue_max_segments(q, max_segments ? max_segments : BLK_MAX_SEGMENTS);
|
||||
blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, PAGE_SIZE-1);
|
||||
|
||||
decide_on_discard_support(device, q, b, discard_zeroes_if_aligned);
|
||||
if (b) {
|
||||
struct drbd_connection *connection = first_peer_device(device)->connection;
|
||||
|
||||
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, DRBD_MAX_DISCARD_SECTORS);
|
||||
|
||||
if (blk_queue_discard(b) && (b->limits.discard_zeroes_data || discard_zeroes_if_aligned) &&
|
||||
(connection->cstate < C_CONNECTED || connection->agreed_features & FF_TRIM)) {
|
||||
/* We don't care, stacking below should fix it for the local device.
|
||||
* Whether or not it is a suitable granularity on the remote device
|
||||
* is not our problem, really. If you care, you need to
|
||||
* use devices with similar topology on all peers. */
|
||||
q->limits.discard_granularity = 512;
|
||||
queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
|
||||
queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
|
||||
q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
blk_queue_stack_limits(q, b);
|
||||
|
||||
if (q->backing_dev_info.ra_pages != b->backing_dev_info.ra_pages) {
|
||||
|
@ -1212,12 +1247,7 @@ static void drbd_setup_queue_param(struct drbd_device *device, struct drbd_backi
|
|||
q->backing_dev_info.ra_pages = b->backing_dev_info.ra_pages;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* To avoid confusion, if this queue does not support discard, clear
|
||||
* max_discard_sectors, which is what lsblk -D reports to the user. */
|
||||
if (!blk_queue_discard(q)) {
|
||||
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
|
||||
q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
fixup_discard_if_not_supported(q);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void drbd_reconsider_queue_parameters(struct drbd_device *device, struct drbd_backing_dev *bdev)
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче