bonding: protect port for bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed()
Jay Vosburgh said that the bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed is called with RTNL only, and the function will modify the port's information with no further locking, it will not mutex against bond state machine and incoming LACPDU which do not hold RTNL, So I add __get_state_machine_lock to protect the port. But it is not a critical bug, it exist since day one, and till now it has never been hit and reported, because changes to speed is very rare, and will not occur critical problem. The comment in the function is very old, cleanup it. Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
35eecf0522
Коммит
71a06c59d1
|
@ -2201,20 +2201,25 @@ void bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed(struct slave *slave)
|
|||
|
||||
port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port);
|
||||
|
||||
// if slave is null, the whole port is not initialized
|
||||
/* if slave is null, the whole port is not initialized */
|
||||
if (!port->slave) {
|
||||
pr_warning("Warning: %s: speed changed for uninitialized port on %s\n",
|
||||
slave->bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__get_state_machine_lock(port);
|
||||
|
||||
port->actor_admin_port_key &= ~AD_SPEED_KEY_BITS;
|
||||
port->actor_oper_port_key = port->actor_admin_port_key |=
|
||||
(__get_link_speed(port) << 1);
|
||||
pr_debug("Port %d changed speed\n", port->actor_port_number);
|
||||
// there is no need to reselect a new aggregator, just signal the
|
||||
// state machines to reinitialize
|
||||
/* there is no need to reselect a new aggregator, just signal the
|
||||
* state machines to reinitialize
|
||||
*/
|
||||
port->sm_vars |= AD_PORT_BEGIN;
|
||||
|
||||
__release_state_machine_lock(port);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче