ext2: Fix underflow in ext2_max_size()

commit 1c2d14212b upstream.

When ext2 filesystem is created with 64k block size, ext2_max_size()
will return value less than 0. Also, we cannot write any file in this fs
since the sb->maxbytes is less than 0. The core of the problem is that
the size of block index tree for such large block size is more than
i_blocks can carry. So fix the computation to count with this
possibility.

File size limits computed with the new function for the full range of
possible block sizes look like:

bits file_size
10     17247252480
11    275415851008
12   2196873666560
13   2197948973056
14   2198486220800
15   2198754754560
16   2198888906752

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jan Kara 2019-01-29 17:17:24 +01:00 коммит произвёл Greg Kroah-Hartman
Родитель b22d9f07fc
Коммит 7412f34ff8
1 изменённых файлов: 26 добавлений и 15 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -754,7 +754,8 @@ static loff_t ext2_max_size(int bits)
{
loff_t res = EXT2_NDIR_BLOCKS;
int meta_blocks;
loff_t upper_limit;
unsigned int upper_limit;
unsigned int ppb = 1 << (bits-2);
/* This is calculated to be the largest file size for a
* dense, file such that the total number of
@ -768,24 +769,34 @@ static loff_t ext2_max_size(int bits)
/* total blocks in file system block size */
upper_limit >>= (bits - 9);
/* indirect blocks */
meta_blocks = 1;
/* double indirect blocks */
meta_blocks += 1 + (1LL << (bits-2));
/* tripple indirect blocks */
meta_blocks += 1 + (1LL << (bits-2)) + (1LL << (2*(bits-2)));
upper_limit -= meta_blocks;
upper_limit <<= bits;
/* Compute how many blocks we can address by block tree */
res += 1LL << (bits-2);
res += 1LL << (2*(bits-2));
res += 1LL << (3*(bits-2));
res <<= bits;
if (res > upper_limit)
res = upper_limit;
/* Does block tree limit file size? */
if (res < upper_limit)
goto check_lfs;
res = upper_limit;
/* How many metadata blocks are needed for addressing upper_limit? */
upper_limit -= EXT2_NDIR_BLOCKS;
/* indirect blocks */
meta_blocks = 1;
upper_limit -= ppb;
/* double indirect blocks */
if (upper_limit < ppb * ppb) {
meta_blocks += 1 + DIV_ROUND_UP(upper_limit, ppb);
res -= meta_blocks;
goto check_lfs;
}
meta_blocks += 1 + ppb;
upper_limit -= ppb * ppb;
/* tripple indirect blocks for the rest */
meta_blocks += 1 + DIV_ROUND_UP(upper_limit, ppb) +
DIV_ROUND_UP(upper_limit, ppb*ppb);
res -= meta_blocks;
check_lfs:
res <<= bits;
if (res > MAX_LFS_FILESIZE)
res = MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;