amd-xgbe: fix the SFP compliance codes check for DAC cables

[ Upstream commit 09c5f6bf11 ]

The current XGBE code assumes that offset 6 of EEPROM SFP DAC (passive)
cables is NULL. However, some cables (the 5 meter and 7 meter Molex
passive cables) have non-zero data at offset 6. Fix the logic by moving
the passive cable check above the active checks, so as not to be
improperly identified as an active cable. This will fix the issue for
any passive cable that advertises 1000Base-CX in offset 6.

Fixes: abf0a1c2b2 ("amd-xgbe: Add support for SFP+ modules")
Signed-off-by: Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Raju Rangoju 2022-10-20 12:12:14 +05:30 коммит произвёл Greg Kroah-Hartman
Родитель 98bada8fa0
Коммит 75a6d1ebf8
1 изменённых файлов: 4 добавлений и 4 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -1151,7 +1151,10 @@ static void xgbe_phy_sfp_parse_eeprom(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata)
}
/* Determine the type of SFP */
if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_SR)
if (phy_data->sfp_cable == XGBE_SFP_CABLE_PASSIVE &&
xgbe_phy_sfp_bit_rate(sfp_eeprom, XGBE_SFP_SPEED_10000))
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_CR;
else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_SR)
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_SR;
else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_LR)
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_LR;
@ -1167,9 +1170,6 @@ static void xgbe_phy_sfp_parse_eeprom(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata)
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_CX;
else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_1GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_1GBE_CC_T)
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_T;
else if ((phy_data->sfp_cable == XGBE_SFP_CABLE_PASSIVE) &&
xgbe_phy_sfp_bit_rate(sfp_eeprom, XGBE_SFP_SPEED_10000))
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_CR;
switch (phy_data->sfp_base) {
case XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_T: