[ACPI] fix passive cooling regression

Return logic was inverted.
Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes
more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()).

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Renninger 2005-12-21 01:29:00 -05:00 коммит произвёл Len Brown
Родитель b05948d9b7
Коммит 75b245b325
1 изменённых файлов: 2 добавлений и 2 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu))
return -ENODEV;
return 0;
return 0;
return 1;
}
static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu)