x86/asm/entry/32: Really make user_mode() work correctly for VM86 mode

While commit efa7045103 ("x86/asm/entry: Make user_mode() work
correctly if regs came from VM86 mode") claims that "user_mode()
is now identical to user_mode_vm()", this wasn't actually the
case - no prior commit made it so.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5566EB0D020000780007E655@mail.emea.novell.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jan Beulich 2015-05-28 09:16:45 +01:00 коммит произвёл Ingo Molnar
Родитель de182468d1
Коммит 7ba554b5ac
1 изменённых файлов: 1 добавлений и 1 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline unsigned long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
static inline int user_mode(struct pt_regs *regs) static inline int user_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
{ {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
return (regs->cs & SEGMENT_RPL_MASK) == USER_RPL; return ((regs->cs & SEGMENT_RPL_MASK) | (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)) >= USER_RPL;
#else #else
return !!(regs->cs & 3); return !!(regs->cs & 3);
#endif #endif