score: don't mask signals if we fail to setup signal stack

If setup_rt_frame() returns -EFAULT then we must not block any signals
in the current process.

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>
Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Matt Fleming 2012-05-11 10:58:05 +10:00 коммит произвёл Al Viro
Родитель 97c47bb707
Коммит 80c1dfa91c
1 изменённых файлов: 8 добавлений и 6 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -272,12 +272,14 @@ static int handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info,
*/
ret = setup_rt_frame(ka, regs, sig, oldset, info);
spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
sigaddset(&current->blocked, sig);
recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
if (ret == 0) {
spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
sigaddset(&current->blocked, sig);
recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
}
return ret;
}