nohz: Clarify magic in tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick()
While going through the nohz code I got stumped by some of it. This patch adds a few comments clarifying the code; based on discussion with Thomas. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151119162106.GO3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
09a9982016
Коммит
82bbe34b3d
|
@ -603,15 +603,31 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts,
|
|||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the tick is due in the next period, keep it ticking or
|
||||
* restart it proper.
|
||||
* force prod the timer.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
delta = next_tick - basemono;
|
||||
if (delta <= (u64)TICK_NSEC) {
|
||||
tick.tv64 = 0;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We've not stopped the tick yet, and there's a timer in the
|
||||
* next period, so no point in stopping it either, bail.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!ts->tick_stopped)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If, OTOH, we did stop it, but there's a pending (expired)
|
||||
* timer reprogram the timer hardware to fire now.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We will not restart the tick proper, just prod the timer
|
||||
* hardware into firing an interrupt to process the pending
|
||||
* timers. Just like tick_irq_exit() will not restart the tick
|
||||
* for 'normal' interrupts.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Only once we exit the idle loop will we re-enable the tick,
|
||||
* see tick_nohz_idle_exit().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (delta == 0) {
|
||||
/* Tick is stopped, but required now. Enforce it */
|
||||
tick_nohz_restart(ts, now);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче