wimax: usb-fw: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369529 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
d331e75897
Коммит
849063074a
|
@ -130,12 +130,12 @@ retry:
|
||||||
dev_err(dev, "BM-CMD: too many stalls in "
|
dev_err(dev, "BM-CMD: too many stalls in "
|
||||||
"URB; resetting device\n");
|
"URB; resetting device\n");
|
||||||
usb_queue_reset_device(i2400mu->usb_iface);
|
usb_queue_reset_device(i2400mu->usb_iface);
|
||||||
/* fallthrough */
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
usb_clear_halt(i2400mu->usb_dev, pipe);
|
usb_clear_halt(i2400mu->usb_dev, pipe);
|
||||||
msleep(10); /* give the device some time */
|
msleep(10); /* give the device some time */
|
||||||
goto retry;
|
goto retry;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
/* fall through */
|
||||||
case -EINVAL: /* while removing driver */
|
case -EINVAL: /* while removing driver */
|
||||||
case -ENODEV: /* dev disconnect ... */
|
case -ENODEV: /* dev disconnect ... */
|
||||||
case -ENOENT: /* just ignore it */
|
case -ENOENT: /* just ignore it */
|
||||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче