From 95bfdf23e4d59099340c01064f39e7f6875c02bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kirill Smelkov Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:07:59 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] tools/liblockdep: Fix debug_check thinko in mutex destroy In mutex destroy code currently we pass to debug_check_no_locks_freed() [mem_from, mem_end) address region. But debug_check_no_locks_freed() accepts mem_from, mem_*len* i.e. second parameter is region length, not end address. And it was always so, starting from 2006 (fbb9ce95 "lockdep: core"). Fix it, or else on a mutex destroy we wrongly check much-wider-than-mutex region and can find not-yet-released other locks there and wrongly report BUGs on them. Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c b/tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c index 6f803609e498..0b0112c80f22 100644 --- a/tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c +++ b/tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ int pthread_mutex_destroy(pthread_mutex_t *mutex) * * TODO: Hook into free() and add that check there as well. */ - debug_check_no_locks_freed(mutex, mutex + sizeof(*mutex)); + debug_check_no_locks_freed(mutex, sizeof(*mutex)); __del_lock(__get_lock(mutex)); return ll_pthread_mutex_destroy(mutex); } @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ int pthread_rwlock_destroy(pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock) { try_init_preload(); - debug_check_no_locks_freed(rwlock, rwlock + sizeof(*rwlock)); + debug_check_no_locks_freed(rwlock, sizeof(*rwlock)); __del_lock(__get_lock(rwlock)); return ll_pthread_rwlock_destroy(rwlock); }