microsoft
/
WSL2-Linux-Kernel
зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/WSL2-Linux-Kernel.git
1
0
Форкнуть 0
Код Задачи Пакеты Проекты Релизы Вики Активность

ring-buffer: Use READ_ONCE() for most tail_page access 

As cpu_buffer->tail_page may be modified by interrupts at almost any time,
the flow of logic is very important. Do not let gcc get smart with
re-reading cpu_buffer->tail_page by adding READ_ONCE() around most of its
accesses.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) 2015-11-17 14:03:11 -05:00 коммит произвёл Steven Rostedt
Родитель 3cbd6a43be
Коммит 8573636ea7
1 изменённых файлов: 11 добавлений и 7 удалений
Показать статистику Скачать Patch файл Скачать Diff файл Показать все файлы Свернуть все файлы

18
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
Просмотреть файл

@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ static int rb_tail_page_update(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
* it is, then it is up to us to update the tail
* pointer.
*/
if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
if (tail_page == READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page)) {
/* Zero the write counter */
unsigned long val = old_write & ~RB_WRITE_MASK;
unsigned long eval = old_entries & ~RB_WRITE_MASK;
@ -2036,12 +2036,15 @@ rb_handle_head_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
* the tail page would have moved.
*/
if (ret == RB_PAGE_NORMAL) {
struct buffer_page *buffer_tail_page;
buffer_tail_page = READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page);
/*
* If the tail had moved passed next, then we need
* to reset the pointer.
*/
if (cpu_buffer->tail_page != tail_page &&
cpu_buffer->tail_page != next_page)
if (buffer_tail_page != tail_page &&
buffer_tail_page != next_page)
rb_head_page_set_normal(cpu_buffer, new_head,
next_page,
RB_PAGE_HEAD);
@ -2362,7 +2365,7 @@ rb_try_to_discard(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
addr = (unsigned long)event;
addr &= PAGE_MASK;
bpage = cpu_buffer->tail_page;
bpage = READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page);
if (bpage->page == (void *)addr && rb_page_write(bpage) == old_index) {
unsigned long write_mask =
@ -2410,7 +2413,7 @@ rb_set_commit_to_write(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
again:
max_count = cpu_buffer->nr_pages * 100;
while (cpu_buffer->commit_page != cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
while (cpu_buffer->commit_page != READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page)) {
if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, !(--max_count)))
return;
if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
@ -2443,7 +2446,7 @@ rb_set_commit_to_write(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
* and pushed the tail page forward, we will be left with
* a dangling commit that will never go forward.
*/
if (unlikely(cpu_buffer->commit_page != cpu_buffer->tail_page))
if (unlikely(cpu_buffer->commit_page != READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page)))
goto again;
}
@ -2699,7 +2702,8 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
if (unlikely(info->add_timestamp))
info->length += RB_LEN_TIME_EXTEND;
tail_page = info->tail_page = cpu_buffer->tail_page;
/* Don't let the compiler play games with cpu_buffer->tail_page */
tail_page = info->tail_page = READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page);
write = local_add_return(info->length, &tail_page->write);
/* set write to only the index of the write */