[PATCH] mbxfb: Fix a chip bug? resulting in wrong pixclock
This is a workaround for what I think is a bug in the 2700G chip. The PLL output frequency is adustable using 3 values (M, N and P. See code for formula). The N value range is documented to be 1 to 7 but when it is set to 1, the output frequency is lower than it should be (divided by 2), giving unexpected results such as no sync on a CRT display. This patch prevents N=1 when searching for the best value for the requested pixclock. Signed-off-by: Raphael Assenat <raph@8d.com> Signed-off-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
9c5b39e0bc
Коммит
8bc218410d
|
@ -118,8 +118,19 @@ static unsigned int mbxfb_get_pixclock(unsigned int pixclock_ps,
|
|||
/* convert pixclock to KHz */
|
||||
pixclock = PICOS2KHZ(pixclock_ps);
|
||||
|
||||
/* PLL output freq = (ref_clk * M) / (N * 2^P)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* M: 1 to 63
|
||||
* N: 1 to 7
|
||||
* P: 0 to 7
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/* RAPH: When N==1, the resulting pixel clock appears to
|
||||
* get divided by 2. Preventing N=1 by starting the following
|
||||
* loop at 2 prevents this. Is this a bug with my chip
|
||||
* revision or something I dont understand? */
|
||||
for (m = 1; m < 64; m++) {
|
||||
for (n = 1; n < 8; n++) {
|
||||
for (n = 2; n < 8; n++) {
|
||||
for (p = 0; p < 8; p++) {
|
||||
clk = (ref_clk * m) / (n * (1 << p));
|
||||
err = (clk > pixclock) ? (clk - pixclock) :
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче