lib/test_printf.c: fix clang -Wformat warnings

see warnings:
| lib/test_printf.c:157:52: error: format specifies type 'unsigned char'
| but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
test("0|1|1|128|255",
| "%hhu|%hhu|%hhu|%hhu|%hhu", 0, 1, 257, 128, -1);
-
| lib/test_printf.c:158:55: error: format specifies type 'char' but the
| argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat] test("0|1|1|-128|-1",
| "%hhd|%hhd|%hhd|%hhd|%hhd", 0, 1, 257, 128, -1);
-
| lib/test_printf.c:159:41: error: format specifies type 'unsigned
short'
| but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
| test("2015122420151225", "%ho%ho%#ho", 1037, 5282, -11627);

There's an ongoing movement to eventually enable the -Wformat flag for
clang. Previous patches have targeted incorrect usage of
format specifiers. In this case, however, the "incorrect" format
specifiers are intrinsically part of the test cases. Hence, fixing them
would be misaligned with their intended purpose. My proposed fix is to
simply disable the warnings so that one day a clean build of the kernel
with clang (and -Wformat enabled) would be possible. It would also keep
us in the green for alot of the CI bots.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/378
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220718230626.1029318-1-justinstitt@google.com
This commit is contained in:
Justin Stitt 2022-07-18 16:06:26 -07:00 коммит произвёл Petr Mladek
Родитель e3c8d33e0d
Коммит 96dd9a2f95
1 изменённых файлов: 11 добавлений и 3 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -30,6 +30,12 @@
#define PAD_SIZE 16
#define FILL_CHAR '$'
#define NOWARN(option, comment, block) \
__diag_push(); \
__diag_ignore_all(#option, comment); \
block \
__diag_pop();
KSTM_MODULE_GLOBALS();
static char *test_buffer __initdata;
@ -159,9 +165,11 @@ test_number(void)
test("0x1234abcd ", "%#-12x", 0x1234abcd);
test(" 0x1234abcd", "%#12x", 0x1234abcd);
test("0|001| 12|+123| 1234|-123|-1234", "%d|%03d|%3d|%+d|% d|%+d|% d", 0, 1, 12, 123, 1234, -123, -1234);
test("0|1|1|128|255", "%hhu|%hhu|%hhu|%hhu|%hhu", 0, 1, 257, 128, -1);
test("0|1|1|-128|-1", "%hhd|%hhd|%hhd|%hhd|%hhd", 0, 1, 257, 128, -1);
test("2015122420151225", "%ho%ho%#ho", 1037, 5282, -11627);
NOWARN(-Wformat, "Intentionally test narrowing conversion specifiers.", {
test("0|1|1|128|255", "%hhu|%hhu|%hhu|%hhu|%hhu", 0, 1, 257, 128, -1);
test("0|1|1|-128|-1", "%hhd|%hhd|%hhd|%hhd|%hhd", 0, 1, 257, 128, -1);
test("2015122420151225", "%ho%ho%#ho", 1037, 5282, -11627);
})
/*
* POSIX/C99: »The result of converting zero with an explicit
* precision of zero shall be no characters.« Hence the output