rcu: Place root rcu_node structure in separate lockdep class
Before this patch, all of the rcu_node structures were in the same lockdep class, so that lockdep would complain when rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() acquired the root rcu_node structure's lock while holding one of the leaf rcu_nodes' locks. This patch changes rcu_init_one() to use a separate spin_lock_init() for the root rcu_node structure's lock than is used for that of all of the rest of the rcu_node structures, which puts the root rcu_node structure's lock in its own lockdep class. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com LKML-Reference: <12548908983277-git-send-email-> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
e74f4c4564
Коммит
978c0b8814
|
@ -1647,6 +1647,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
|||
cpustride *= rsp->levelspread[i];
|
||||
rnp = rsp->level[i];
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < rsp->levelcnt[i]; j++, rnp++) {
|
||||
if (rnp != rcu_get_root(rsp))
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
rnp->gpnum = 0;
|
||||
rnp->qsmask = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -1670,6 +1671,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
|||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rnp->blocked_tasks[1]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче