From 98589a0998b8b13c4a8fa1ccb0e62751a019faa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shmulik Ladkani Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:27:15 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_bpf: Fix XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode of 'xt_bpf_info_v1' Commit 2c16d6033264 ("netfilter: xt_bpf: support ebpf") introduced support for attaching an eBPF object by an fd, with the 'bpf_mt_check_v1' ABI expecting the '.fd' to be specified upon each IPT_SO_SET_REPLACE call. However this breaks subsequent iptables calls: # iptables -A INPUT -m bpf --object-pinned /sys/fs/bpf/xxx -j ACCEPT # iptables -A INPUT -s 5.6.7.8 -j ACCEPT iptables: Invalid argument. Run `dmesg' for more information. That's because iptables works by loading existing rules using IPT_SO_GET_ENTRIES to userspace, then issuing IPT_SO_SET_REPLACE with the replacement set. However, the loaded 'xt_bpf_info_v1' has an arbitrary '.fd' number (from the initial "iptables -m bpf" invocation) - so when 2nd invocation occurs, userspace passes a bogus fd number, which leads to 'bpf_mt_check_v1' to fail. One suggested solution [1] was to hack iptables userspace, to perform a "entries fixup" immediatley after IPT_SO_GET_ENTRIES, by opening a new, process-local fd per every 'xt_bpf_info_v1' entry seen. However, in [2] both Pablo Neira Ayuso and Willem de Bruijn suggested to depricate the xt_bpf_info_v1 ABI dealing with pinned ebpf objects. This fix changes the XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED behavior to ignore the given '.fd' and instead perform an in-kernel lookup for the bpf object given the provided '.path'. It also defines an alias for the XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode, named XT_BPF_MODE_PATH_PINNED, to better reflect the fact that the user is expected to provide the path of the pinned object. Existing XT_BPF_MODE_FD_ELF behavior (non-pinned fd mode) is preserved. References: [1] https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=150564724607440&w=2 [2] https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=150575727129880&w=2 Reported-by: Rafael Buchbinder Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso --- include/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++ include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_bpf.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/inode.c | 1 + net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 8390859e79e7..f1af7d63d678 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -368,6 +368,11 @@ static inline void __bpf_prog_uncharge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages) { } +static inline int bpf_obj_get_user(const char __user *pathname) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + static inline struct net_device *__dev_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, u32 key) { diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_bpf.h index b97725af2ac0..da161b56c79e 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_bpf.h @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ enum xt_bpf_modes { XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED, XT_BPF_MODE_FD_ELF, }; +#define XT_BPF_MODE_PATH_PINNED XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED struct xt_bpf_info_v1 { __u16 mode; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c index e833ed914358..be1dde967208 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ out: putname(pname); return ret; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_obj_get_user); static void bpf_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) { diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c b/net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c index 38986a95216c..29123934887b 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ */ #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -49,6 +50,22 @@ static int __bpf_mt_check_fd(int fd, struct bpf_prog **ret) return 0; } +static int __bpf_mt_check_path(const char *path, struct bpf_prog **ret) +{ + mm_segment_t oldfs = get_fs(); + int retval, fd; + + set_fs(KERNEL_DS); + fd = bpf_obj_get_user(path); + set_fs(oldfs); + if (fd < 0) + return fd; + + retval = __bpf_mt_check_fd(fd, ret); + sys_close(fd); + return retval; +} + static int bpf_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) { struct xt_bpf_info *info = par->matchinfo; @@ -66,9 +83,10 @@ static int bpf_mt_check_v1(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) return __bpf_mt_check_bytecode(info->bpf_program, info->bpf_program_num_elem, &info->filter); - else if (info->mode == XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED || - info->mode == XT_BPF_MODE_FD_ELF) + else if (info->mode == XT_BPF_MODE_FD_ELF) return __bpf_mt_check_fd(info->fd, &info->filter); + else if (info->mode == XT_BPF_MODE_PATH_PINNED) + return __bpf_mt_check_path(info->path, &info->filter); else return -EINVAL; }