[EBTABLES]: Deal with the worst-case behaviour in loop checks.
No need to revisit a chain we'd already finished with during the check for current hook. It's either instant loop (which we'd just detected) or a duplicate work. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
40642f95f5
Коммит
98a0824a0f
|
@ -717,7 +717,9 @@ static int check_chainloops(struct ebt_entries *chain, struct ebt_cl_stack *cl_s
|
|||
BUGPRINT("loop\n");
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* this can't be 0, so the above test is correct */
|
||||
if (cl_s[i].hookmask & (1 << hooknr))
|
||||
goto letscontinue;
|
||||
/* this can't be 0, so the loop test is correct */
|
||||
cl_s[i].cs.n = pos + 1;
|
||||
pos = 0;
|
||||
cl_s[i].cs.e = ((void *)e + e->next_offset);
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче