ocfs2: __ocfs2_mark_extent_written() doesn't need struct inode.

We only allow unwritten extents on data, so the toplevel
ocfs2_mark_extent_written() can use an inode all it wants.  But the
subfunction isn't even using the inode argument.

Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Joel Becker 2009-02-13 03:45:49 -08:00
Родитель f3868d0fa2
Коммит a1cf076ba9
1 изменённых файлов: 3 добавлений и 4 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -5026,9 +5026,8 @@ out:
* have been brought into cache (and pinned via the journal), so the
* extra overhead is not expressed in terms of disk reads.
*/
static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode,
static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(handle_t *handle,
struct ocfs2_extent_tree *et,
handle_t *handle,
struct ocfs2_path *path,
int split_index,
struct ocfs2_extent_rec *split_rec,
@ -5062,7 +5061,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode,
/*
* The core merge / split code wants to know how much room is
* left in this inodes allocation tree, so we pass the
* left in this allocation tree, so we pass the
* rightmost extent list.
*/
if (path->p_tree_depth) {
@ -5185,7 +5184,7 @@ int ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode,
split_rec.e_flags = path_leaf_el(left_path)->l_recs[index].e_flags;
split_rec.e_flags &= ~OCFS2_EXT_UNWRITTEN;
ret = __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(inode, et, handle, left_path,
ret = __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(handle, et, left_path,
index, &split_rec, meta_ac,
dealloc);
if (ret)