ocfs2: __ocfs2_mark_extent_written() doesn't need struct inode.
We only allow unwritten extents on data, so the toplevel ocfs2_mark_extent_written() can use an inode all it wants. But the subfunction isn't even using the inode argument. Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
f3868d0fa2
Коммит
a1cf076ba9
|
@ -5026,9 +5026,8 @@ out:
|
|||
* have been brought into cache (and pinned via the journal), so the
|
||||
* extra overhead is not expressed in terms of disk reads.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode,
|
||||
static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(handle_t *handle,
|
||||
struct ocfs2_extent_tree *et,
|
||||
handle_t *handle,
|
||||
struct ocfs2_path *path,
|
||||
int split_index,
|
||||
struct ocfs2_extent_rec *split_rec,
|
||||
|
@ -5062,7 +5061,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode,
|
|||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The core merge / split code wants to know how much room is
|
||||
* left in this inodes allocation tree, so we pass the
|
||||
* left in this allocation tree, so we pass the
|
||||
* rightmost extent list.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (path->p_tree_depth) {
|
||||
|
@ -5185,7 +5184,7 @@ int ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode,
|
|||
split_rec.e_flags = path_leaf_el(left_path)->l_recs[index].e_flags;
|
||||
split_rec.e_flags &= ~OCFS2_EXT_UNWRITTEN;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(inode, et, handle, left_path,
|
||||
ret = __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(handle, et, left_path,
|
||||
index, &split_rec, meta_ac,
|
||||
dealloc);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче