ARM: prima2: rstc: fix some minor checkpatch issues

this patch fixes the below minor issues:

WARNING: line over 80 characters
39: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:39:
+                * Writing 1 to this bit resets corresponding block. Writing 0 to this

WARNING: line over 80 characters
41: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:41:
+                * datasheet doesn't require explicit delay between the set and clear

WARNING: line over 80 characters
44: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:44:
+               writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4) | (1 << reset_bit),

WARNING: msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt
46: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:46:
+               msleep(10);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
47: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:47:
+               writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4) & ~(1 << reset_bit),

WARNING: line over 80 characters
52: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:52:
+                * Writing 1 to SET register resets corresponding block. Writing 1 to CLEAR

WARNING: line over 80 characters
54: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:54:
+                * datasheet doesn't require explicit delay between the set and clear

WARNING: line over 80 characters
57: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:57:
+               writel(1 << reset_bit, sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8);

WARNING: msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt
58: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:58:
+               msleep(10);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
59: FILE: arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c:59:
+               writel(1 << reset_bit, sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8 + 4);

total: 0 errors, 10 warnings, 120 lines checked

Signed-off-by: Xianglong Du <Xianglong.Du@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
This commit is contained in:
Xianglong Du 2014-05-07 15:08:21 +08:00 коммит произвёл Barry Song
Родитель d1db0eea85
Коммит a2a2568311
1 изменённых файлов: 20 добавлений и 14 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -36,27 +36,33 @@ static int sirfsoc_reset_module(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
if (of_device_is_compatible(rcdev->of_node, "sirf,prima2-rstc")) {
/*
* Writing 1 to this bit resets corresponding block. Writing 0 to this
* bit de-asserts reset signal of the corresponding block.
* datasheet doesn't require explicit delay between the set and clear
* of reset bit. it could be shorter if tests pass.
* Writing 1 to this bit resets corresponding block.
* Writing 0 to this bit de-asserts reset signal of the
* corresponding block. datasheet doesn't require explicit
* delay between the set and clear of reset bit. it could
* be shorter if tests pass.
*/
writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4) | (1 << reset_bit),
writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base +
(reset_bit / 32) * 4) | (1 << reset_bit),
sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4);
msleep(10);
writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4) & ~(1 << reset_bit),
msleep(20);
writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base +
(reset_bit / 32) * 4) & ~(1 << reset_bit),
sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4);
} else {
/*
* For MARCO and POLO
* Writing 1 to SET register resets corresponding block. Writing 1 to CLEAR
* register de-asserts reset signal of the corresponding block.
* datasheet doesn't require explicit delay between the set and clear
* of reset bit. it could be shorter if tests pass.
* Writing 1 to SET register resets corresponding block.
* Writing 1 to CLEAR register de-asserts reset signal of the
* corresponding block.
* datasheet doesn't require explicit delay between the set and
* clear of reset bit. it could be shorter if tests pass.
*/
writel(1 << reset_bit, sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8);
msleep(10);
writel(1 << reset_bit, sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8 + 4);
writel(1 << reset_bit,
sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8);
msleep(20);
writel(1 << reset_bit,
sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8 + 4);
}
mutex_unlock(&rstc_lock);